» Articles » PMID: 30678208

Updating the Role of Reduced Graphene Oxide Ink on Field Emission Devices in Synergy with Charge Transfer Materials

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 26
PMID 30678208
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hydroiodic acid (HI)-treated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) ink/conductive polymeric composites are considered as promising cold cathodes in terms of high geometrical aspect ratio and low field emission (FE) threshold devices. In this study, four simple, cost-effective, solution-processed approaches for rGO-based field effect emitters were developed, optimized, and compared; rGO layers were coated on (a) n+ doped Si substrate, (b) n⁺-Si/P3HT:rGO, (c) n⁺-Si/PCDTBT:rGO, and (d) n⁺-Si/PCDTBT:PCBM:rGO composites, respectively. The fabricated emitters were optimized by tailoring the concentration ratios of their preparation and field emission characteristics. In a critical composite ratio, FE performance was remarkably improved compared to the pristine Si, as well as n⁺-Si/rGO field emitter. In this context, the impact of various materials, such as polymers, fullerene derivatives, as well as different solvents on rGO function reinforcement and consequently on FE performance upon rGO-based composites preparation was investigated. The field emitter consisted of n⁺-Si/PCDTBT:PCBM(80%):rGO(20%)/rGO displayed a field enhancement factor of ~2850, with remarkable stability over 20 h and low turn-on field in 0.6 V/μm. High-efficiency graphene-based FE devices realization paves the way towards low-cost, large-scale electron sources development. Finally, the contribution of this hierarchical, composite film morphology was evaluated and discussed.

Citing Articles

The design of a point of care FET biosensor to detect and screen COVID-19.

Alnaji N, Wasfi A, Awwad F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4485.

PMID: 36934198 PMC: 10024292. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31679-5.


Tribological Performance Investigation of a Commercial Engine Oil Incorporating Reduced Graphene Oxide as Additive.

Kaleli H, Demirtas S, Uysal V, Karnis I, Stylianakis M, Anastasiadis S Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33546353 PMC: 7913578. DOI: 10.3390/nano11020386.


2D Nanocomposite Membranes: Water Purification and Fouling Mitigation.

Loske L, Nakagawa K, Yoshioka T, Matsuyama H Membranes (Basel). 2020; 10(10).

PMID: 33092187 PMC: 7589742. DOI: 10.3390/membranes10100295.


Interactions of Zinc Oxide Nanostructures with Mammalian Cells: Cytotoxicity and Photocatalytic Toxicity.

Liao C, Jin Y, Li Y, Tjong S Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17).

PMID: 32878253 PMC: 7504403. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176305.


Optoelectronic Nanodevices.

Stylianakis M Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020; 10(3).

PMID: 32183135 PMC: 7153245. DOI: 10.3390/nano10030520.


References
1.
Stylianakis M, Stratakis E, Koudoumas E, Kymakis E, Anastasiadis S . Organic bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices based on polythiophene-graphene composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012; 4(9):4864-70. DOI: 10.1021/am301204g. View

2.
Moon I, Lee J, Ruoff R, Lee H . Reduced graphene oxide by chemical graphitization. Nat Commun. 2010; 1:73. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1067. View

3.
de Jonge N, Lamy Y, Schoots K, Oosterkamp T . High brightness electron beam from a multi-walled carbon nanotube. Nature. 2002; 420(6914):393-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature01233. View

4.
Munoz-Marquez M, Zarrabeitia M, Castillo-Martinez E, Eguia-Barrio A, Rojo T, Casas-Cabanas M . Composition and evolution of the solid-electrolyte interphase in Na2Ti3O7 electrodes for Na-ion batteries: XPS and Auger parameter analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015; 7(14):7801-8. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01375. View

5.
Luo Z, Lu Y, Somers L, Johnson A . High yield preparation of macroscopic graphene oxide membranes. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(3):898-9. DOI: 10.1021/ja807934n. View