» Articles » PMID: 30675315

Differences in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Epidemiology and Screening in the WHO European Region

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jan 25
PMID 30675315
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the Colorectal Cancer (CRC) burden and prevention actions in 53 countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region (ER). Multiple correspondence analysis was applied to examine the association among the following variables: Measures of occurrence; type of screening programme; existence of cancer registries; data quality and; and gross national income (GNI) level. The study demonstrated clear differences according to GNI: low-middle income (LMI) countries show low mortality rates and unorganized screening programme; upper-middle income (UMI) countries show no test offered, incomplete or absent data mortality, and low quality of the method used to estimate incidence and mortality rates; high income (HI) countries show high mortality rates, test offered (FOBT and colonoscopy), the existence of a national registry, screening population-based, insurance of payment policy, and high quality of the method used to estimate incidence and mortality rates. HI countries reflect a strong interest in epidemiological monitoring and produce accurate indicators of disease occurrence. On the other hand, surveillance strategies need to be improved in UMI and LMI countries: As national vital statistics are unavailable, partial or inaccurate, the coverage and completeness of the mortality data are frequently poor, there is a less efficient general organization. In conclusion, it is important to underline that the resources available (as measured by GNI) appear to be major factors in the Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Epidemiology and Screening in the WHO European Region.

Citing Articles

Exploratory Evaluation of Pre-Treatment Inflammation Profiles in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Feier C, Muntean C, Bolboaca S, Olariu S Diseases. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38534985 PMC: 10969462. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12030061.


The Effects of the Ukrainian Conflict on Oncological Care: The Latest State of the Art.

Altobelli E, Angeletti P, Farello G, Petrocelli R Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36766858 PMC: 9914056. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030283.


Should we screen for colorectal cancer in people aged 75 and over? A systematic review - collaborative work of the French geriatric oncology society (SOFOG) and the French federation of digestive oncology (FFCD).

Guittet L, Quipourt V, Aparicio T, Carola E, Seitz J, Paillaud E BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):17.

PMID: 36604640 PMC: 9817257. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10418-5.


A scoping review on population-centered indicators for cancer care continuum.

Rajaguru V, Jang J, Kwon J, Kim J, Shin J, Chun M Front Public Health. 2022; 10:912946.

PMID: 36311597 PMC: 9614426. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.912946.


Abdominal Aortic Screening Is a Priority for Health in Smoker Males: A Study on Central Italian Population.

Altobelli E, Gianfelice F, Angeletti P, Petrocelli R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1).

PMID: 35010845 PMC: 8744758. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010591.


References
1.
Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre M . The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(4):505-27. PMC: 4500822. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. View

2.
Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ali M, Warren R, Kenny M, Sherifali D, Raina P . Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016; 15(4):298-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.03.003. View

3.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen A, Brenner H . Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 33:88-100. PMC: 3132805. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr004. View

4.
Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D . Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(8):790-801. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5. View

5.
Altobelli E . Improving cervical cancer screening in Baltic, central, and eastern European countries. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(10):1349-1350. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30388-6. View