» Articles » PMID: 30669516

Application of Prostate Cancer Models for Preclinical Study: Advantages and Limitations of Cell Lines, Patient-Derived Xenografts, and Three-Dimensional Culture of Patient-Derived Cells

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Jan 24
PMID 30669516
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various preclinical models have been developed to clarify the pathophysiology of prostate cancer (PCa). Traditional PCa cell lines from clinical metastatic lesions, as exemplified by DU-145, PC-3, and LNCaP cells, are useful tools to define mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Cell line-based experiments, however, have limitations for preclinical studies because those cells are basically adapted to 2-dimensional monolayer culture conditions, in which the majority of primary PCa cells cannot survive. Recent tissue engineering enables generation of PCa patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from both primary and metastatic lesions. Compared with fresh PCa tissue transplantation in athymic mice, co-injection of PCa tissues with extracellular matrix in highly immunodeficient mice has remarkably improved the success rate of PDX generation. PDX models have advantages to appropriately recapitulate the molecular diversity, cellular heterogeneity, and histology of original patient tumors. In contrast to PDX models, patient-derived organoid and spheroid PCa models in 3-dimensional culture are more feasible tools for in vitro studies for retaining the characteristics of patient tumors. In this article, we review PCa preclinical model cell lines and their sublines, PDXs, and patient-derived organoid and spheroid models. These PCa models will be applied to the development of new strategies for cancer precision medicine.

Citing Articles

Pyridine indole hybrids as novel potent CYP17A1 inhibitors.

Wrobel T, Grudzinska A, Yakubu J, du Toit T, Sharma K, Harrington J J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2025; 40(1):2463014.

PMID: 39950830 PMC: 11834790. DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2025.2463014.


The Potential Therapeutic Targets of Anlotinib in Osteosarcoma: Characterization Based on Patient-Derived Xenografts and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Long Z, Lu Y, Li M, Li J, Chen G, Wang F Cancer Med. 2024; 13(23):e70416.

PMID: 39618078 PMC: 11609326. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70416.


Effect of Soy Isoflavone on Prostate Cancer Cell Apoptosis Through Inhibition of STAT3, ERK, and AKT.

Lee Y, Lee C, Choi D, Lee Y, Lee S Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(11):12512-12526.

PMID: 39590337 PMC: 11592447. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46110743.


Potential of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in neuro-oncology.

Steindl A, Valiente M Neuro Oncol. 2024; 27(2):338-351.

PMID: 39504579 PMC: 11812025. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae195.


Antagonist of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptor MIA-690 Suppresses the Growth of Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancers.

Munoz-Moreno L, Gomez-Calcerrada M, Arenas M, Carmena M, Prieto J, Schally A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456984 PMC: 11508372. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011200.


References
1.
Bakht M, Derecichei I, Li Y, Ferraiuolo R, Dunning M, Oh S . Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer leads to PSMA suppression. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018; 26(2):131-146. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-18-0226. View

2.
Zhao X, Boyle B, Krishnan A, Navone N, Peehl D, Feldman D . Two mutations identified in the androgen receptor of the new human prostate cancer cell line MDA PCa 2a. J Urol. 1999; 162(6):2192-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68158-X. View

3.
Ryan C, Smith M, de Bono J, Molina A, Logothetis C, de Souza P . Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012; 368(2):138-48. PMC: 3683570. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. View

4.
Chen X, Li Q, Liu X, Liu C, Liu R, Rycaj K . Defining a Population of Stem-like Human Prostate Cancer Cells That Can Generate and Propagate Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(17):4505-16. PMC: 5010458. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2956. View

5.
Solit D, Garraway L, Pratilas C, Sawai A, Getz G, Basso A . BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition. Nature. 2005; 439(7074):358-62. PMC: 3306236. DOI: 10.1038/nature04304. View