» Articles » PMID: 30667588

Weight Management Telehealth Intervention for Overweight and Obese Rural Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants: A Randomised Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Nurs
Specialty Nursing
Date 2019 Jan 23
PMID 30667588
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims And Objectives: To determine whether a weight management intervention (WMI) plus cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared to CR alone improves outcomes for overweight and obese cardiac revascularisation patients.

Background: Despite participating in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), few cardiac patients lose enough weight to achieve clinically significant cardiovascular disease risk reduction.

Design: A randomised controlled design was used with measurements at baseline, 4 and 6 months, guided by the CONSORT checklist, see Supporting Information File S1. Adults who had undergone either coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and participated in a rural CR programmes were recruited. Subjects were randomised to a 12-week telehealth WMI or control group. The primary outcome was weight loss. Secondary outcomes included physical activity, patient activation, perceived self-efficacy and use of weight management behaviours.

Results: A total of 43 subjects participated, with a mean age of 63 (±9.3) years. The WMI group had significantly more weight loss averaged across the 4 and 6 months of 13.8 (±2.8) pounds compared to the control group [mean = 7.8 (±2.2) pounds]. There were no significant differences in physical activity (activity counts or daily minutes in moderate or more intense activity). The WMI group had significantly higher levels of patient activation. They also had significantly higher total scores on the Diet and Exercise Self-Management survey, and subscales that included self-efficacy for specific eating habits and managing diet behaviour.

Conclusions: Findings demonstrated the usefulness and feasibility of using telehealth delivery of the WMI for cardiac rehabilitation participants in rural communities to improve weight management outcomes.

Relevance To Practice: Study findings underscore the opportunity to further improve weight loss of overweight and obese cardiac participants using a weight management intervention to augment CR participation.

Citing Articles

The Efficacy of Telehealth Versus In-Person Management Delivery in Adult Patients with Obesity.

Alolayan R, Aldisi D, Hussain D, Alafif N, Abulmeaty M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(21).

PMID: 39517400 PMC: 11545763. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12212190.


Digital health intervention in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Harbi A, Soh K, Yubbu P, Soh K F1000Res. 2024; 13:596.

PMID: 38984016 PMC: 11231633. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.152315.1.


Digital tools in cardiac reperfusion pathways: A systematic review.

Chhatwal K, Deighton A, Dhir A, Kumar V, Titus-Glover S, Shah D Future Healthc J. 2024; 11(1):100128.

PMID: 38689702 PMC: 11059274. DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0033.


Effectiveness and Feasibility of Telehealth-Based Dietary Interventions Targeting Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Trivedi R, Elshafie S, Tackett R, Young H, Sattler E J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49178.

PMID: 38363635 PMC: 10907949. DOI: 10.2196/49178.


A comparison of virtual and in person delivery of a full meal replacement program for obesity.

Skeldon M, Harris D, Dent R, Shiau J Obes Sci Pract. 2024; 10(1):e718.

PMID: 38259352 PMC: 10801667. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.718.


References
1.
Gordon N, Salmon R, Mitchell B, Faircloth G, Levinrad L, Salmon S . Innovative approaches to comprehensive cardiovascular disease risk reduction in clinical and community-based settings. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001; 3(6):498-506. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-001-0040-9. View

2.
Savage P, Lee M, Harvey-Berino J, Brochu M, Ades P . Weight reduction in the cardiac rehabilitation setting. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002; 22(3):154-60. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200205000-00005. View

3.
. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(12):2165-71. PMC: 1282458. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165. View

4.
Hickey M, Owen S, Froman R . Instrument development: cardiac diet and exercise self-efficacy. Nurs Res. 1992; 41(6):347-51. View

5.
Southard B, Southard D, Nuckolls J . Clinical trial of an Internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003; 23(5):341-8. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200309000-00003. View