» Articles » PMID: 30665430

Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture: an Update on Surgery Rates and Treatment Consensus

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jan 23
PMID 30665430
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level.

Results: Among patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p < .0001). Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture persisted after adjustment for patient demographic and clinical differences across local areas. Average surgery rates ranged from 9.9 to 21.2% across area treatment ratio quintiles.

Conclusions: Persistent geographic variation in surgery rates for proximal humerus fracture across the USA suggests no treatment consensus has been reached.

Citing Articles

Human-centered design of a health recommender system for orthopaedic shoulder treatment.

Singh A, Schooley B, Mobley J, Mobley P, Lindros S, Brooks J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):17.

PMID: 39794787 PMC: 11720343. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02850-x.


Trends in Epidemiology and Treatment of Humerus Fractures in the United States, 2017-2022.

Ghayyad K, Beaudoin T, Osbahr D, Huffman G, Kachooei A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66936.

PMID: 39280367 PMC: 11401597. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66936.


Understanding Changing Demographic and Treatment Trends of Distal Radius Fractures: A TriNetX Database Contemporary Analysis of 32,912 Patients.

Mahmoud Y, Chung J, Pirzada W, Ilyas A J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024; 6(4):477-483.

PMID: 39166207 PMC: 11331155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.005.


Regional variations in incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study.

Hallinen M, Sallinen H, Keskinen H, Matilainen M, Ekman E Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:401-406.

PMID: 39016345 PMC: 11253709. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41089.


Human-centered Design of a Health Recommender System for Orthopaedic Shoulder Treatment.

Singh A, Schooley B, Mobley J, Mobley P, Lindros S, Brooks J Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38826294 PMC: 11142362. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4359437/v1.


References
1.
Weinstein J, Bronner K, Shawver Morgan T, Wennberg J . Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004; Suppl Variation:VAR81-9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.81. View

2.
Obremskey W, Pappas N, Attallah-Wasif E, Tornetta 3rd P, Bhandari M . Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(12):2632-2638. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00370. View

3.
Carr A . Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery: what type of research will best improve clinical practice?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(12):1593-4. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.17085. View

4.
Wright J, Swiontkowski M, Heckman J . Levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(9):1264. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.18389. View

5.
Weinstein J, Lurie J, Olson P, Bronner K, Fisher E . United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(23):2707-14. PMC: 2913862. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe. View