» Articles » PMID: 30662274

Oral Sitafloxacin Vs Intravenous Ceftriaxone Followed by Oral Cefdinir for Acute Pyelonephritis and Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: The conventional antibiotic regimen for community-acquired upper urinary tract infections with moderate severity in Thailand is parenteral ceftriaxone (CTRX) for several days followed by oral cephalosporin for 7-14 days. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin (STFX) with that of intravenous CTRX followed by oral cefdinir (CFDN) for the therapy of acute pyelonephritis (APN) and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI).

Methods: This open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical trial included patients from nine centers across Thailand. Adult patients with APN or cUTI were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of oral STFX twice daily for 7-14 days, or 2 g of intravenous CTRX for several days followed by 100 mg of oral CFDN three times per day for another 4-12 days.

Results: A total of 289 adult patients with APN or cUTI (141 in the STFX group and 148 in the CTRX/CFDN group) were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 211 patients (108 in the STFX group and 103 in the CTRX/CFDN group) were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were comparable. The causative pathogen in most patients with APN or cUTI was . The clinical success rates at the end of treatment revealed the STFX regimen to be noninferior to the CTRX/CFDN regimen (86.6% vs 83.8% for ITT analysis and 97.2% vs 99.0% for PP analysis, respectively). Adverse events with mild-to-moderate severity were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Oral STFX is noninferior to intravenous CTRX followed by oral CFDN in adult patients with APN and cUTI. Lower rates of resistance compared to CTRX and/or CFDN and oral administration suggest STFX as a more attractive treatment option in this patient population.

Citing Articles

Antibacterial Mechanisms and Clinical Impact of Sitafloxacin.

Kuhn E, Sominsky L, Chitto M, Schwarz E, Moriarty T Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(11).

PMID: 39598446 PMC: 11597390. DOI: 10.3390/ph17111537.


Efficacy of Sitafloxacin for in an Era of Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance.

Samra R, Plummer E, Vodstrcil L, Aguirre I, Clarke E, Fairley C Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(12):ofad590.

PMID: 38094665 PMC: 10716737. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad590.


Definitions of Urinary Tract Infection in Current Research: A Systematic Review.

Bilsen M, Jongeneel R, Schneeberger C, Platteel T, Van Nieuwkoop C, Mody L Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(7):ofad332.

PMID: 37426954 PMC: 10323732. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad332.


Overview of Side-Effects of Antibacterial Fluoroquinolones: New Drugs versus Old Drugs, a Step Forward in the Safety Profile?.

Rusu A, Munteanu A, Arbanasi E, Uivarosi V Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36986665 PMC: 10056716. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030804.


Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Predict Discharge in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Pyelonephritis: A Study From Karachi, Pakistan.

Syed F, Rehman F, Amin I, Ali S, Rind B, Ahmed B Cureus. 2020; 12(10):e11024.

PMID: 33214952 PMC: 7671293. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11024.


References
1.
Stamm W, Norrby S . Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. J Infect Dis. 2001; 183 Suppl 1:S1-4. DOI: 10.1086/318850. View

2.
Dawe R, Ibbotson S, Sanderson J, Thomson E, Ferguson J . A randomized controlled trial (volunteer study) of sitafloxacin, enoxacin, levofloxacin and sparfloxacin phototoxicity. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 149(6):1232-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2003.05582.x. View

3.
Anderson D . Sitafloxacin hydrate for bacterial infections. Drugs Today (Barc). 2008; 44(7):489-501. DOI: 10.1358/dot.2008.44.7.1219561. View

4.
Yamaguchi K, Ohno A, Ishii Y, Tateda K, Iwata M, Kanda M . [In vitro susceptibilities to levofloxacin and various antibacterial agents of 12,919 clinical isolates obtained from 72 centers in 2007]. Jpn J Antibiot. 2009; 62(4):346-70. View

5.
Auer S, Wojna A, Hell M . Oral treatment options for ambulatory patients with urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(9):4006-8. PMC: 2935012. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01760-09. View