» Articles » PMID: 30659867

Common Neural Processes During Action-stopping and Infrequent Stimulus Detection: The Frontocentral P3 As an Index of Generic Motor Inhibition

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Jan 20
PMID 30659867
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The stop-signal task (SST) is used to study action-stopping in the laboratory. In SSTs, the P3 event-related potential following stop-signals is considered to be a neural index of motor inhibition. However, a similar P3 deflection is often observed following infrequent events in non-inhibition tasks. Moreover, within SSTs, stop-signals are indeed infrequent events, presenting a systematic confound that hampers the interpretation of the stop-signal P3 (and other candidate neural indices of motor inhibition). Therefore, we performed two studies to test whether the stop-signal P3 is uniquely related to motor inhibition or reflects infrequency detection. In Study 1, participants completed the SST and a visually identical change-detection task requiring the detection of a task-relevant, frequent signal (but not motor inhibition). We observed a P3 associated with motor inhibition in the SST, but no such positivity in the change-detection task. In Study 2, we modified the change-detection task. Some task-relevant events were now infrequent, matching the frequency of stop-signals in the SST. These events indeed evoked a P3, though of smaller amplitude than the P3 in the SST. Independent component analysis suggested that stop-signal P3 and infrequency-P3 ERPs were non-independent and shared a common neural generator. Further analyses suggested that this common neural process likely reflects motor inhibition in both tasks: infrequent events in the change-detection task lead to a non-instructed, incidental slowing of motor responding, the degree of which was strongly correlated with P3 amplitude. These results have wide-reaching implications for the interpretation of neural signals in both stop-signal and infrequency/oddball-tasks.

Citing Articles

Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?.

Hervault M, Soh C, Wessel J Cortex. 2025; 183:232-250.

PMID: 39754857 PMC: 11839379. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.12.005.


Common and unique neurophysiological signatures for the stopping and revising of actions reveal the temporal dynamics of inhibitory control.

Hervault M, Wessel J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38948849 PMC: 11212930. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.18.597172.


Biophysical Modeling of Frontocentral ERP Generation Links Circuit-Level Mechanisms of Action-Stopping to a Behavioral Race Model.

Diesburg D, Wessel J, Jones S J Neurosci. 2024; 44(20).

PMID: 38561227 PMC: 11097283. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2016-23.2024.


Transcranial focused ultrasound to human rIFG improves response inhibition through modulation of the P300 onset latency.

Fine J, Mysore A, Fini M, Tyler W, Santello M Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38117053 PMC: 10796145. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.86190.


Biophysical modeling of frontocentral ERP generation links circuit-level mechanisms of action-stopping to a behavioral race model.

Diesburg D, Wessel J, Jones S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37961333 PMC: 10634895. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.25.564020.


References
1.
Obeso I, Wilkinson L, Casabona E, Bringas M, Alvarez M, Alvarez L . Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 212(3):371-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2736-6. View

2.
Parent A, Hazrati L . Anatomical aspects of information processing in primate basal ganglia. Trends Neurosci. 1993; 16(3):111-6. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90135-9. View

3.
Kok A, Ramautar J, de Ruiter M, Band G, Ridderinkhof K . ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology. 2003; 41(1):9-20. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x. View

4.
Nigg J . The ADHD response-inhibition deficit as measured by the stop task: replication with DSM-IV combined type, extension, and qualification. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999; 27(5):393-402. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021980002473. View

5.
Alegre M, Lopez-Azcarate J, Obeso I, Wilkinson L, Rodriguez-Oroz M, Valencia M . The subthalamic nucleus is involved in successful inhibition in the stop-signal task: a local field potential study in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2012; 239:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.027. View