» Articles » PMID: 30658616

To What Extent Can the Activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies Initiative Be Linked to Population Health Outcomes Using a Program Theory-based Evaluation?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Jan 20
PMID 30658616
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This paper reports on a five-year study using a theory-based program logic evaluation, and supporting survey and interview data to examine the extent to which the activites of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative can be linked to population health outcomes.

Methods: Mixed-methods data were collected between 2012 and 2016 in South Australia (144 semi-structured key informant interviews; two electronic surveys of public servants in 2013 (n = 435) and 2015 (n = 483); analysis of state government policy documents; and construction of a program logic model to shape assessment of the feasibility of attribution to population health outcomes).

Results: Multiple actions on social determinants of health in a range of state government sectors were reported and most could be linked through a program logic model to making some contribution to future population health outcomes. Context strongly influences implementation; not all initiatives will be successful and experimentation is vital. Successful initiatives included HiAP influencing the urban planning department to be more concerned with the health impacts of planning decisions, and encouraging the environment department to be concerned with the health impacts of its work.

Conclusions: The theory-based program logic suggests that SA HiAP facilitated improved population health through working with multiple government departments. Public servants came to appreciate how their sectors impact on health. Program logic is a mechanism to evaluate complex public health interventions in a way that takes account of political and economic contexts. SA HiAP was mainly successful in avoiding lifestyle drift in strategy. The initiative encouraged a range of state government departments to tackle conditions of daily living. The broader underpinning factors dictating the distribution of power, money and resources were not addressed by HiAP. This reflects HiAP's use of a consensus model which was driven by (rather than drove) state priorities and sought 'win-win' strategies.

Citing Articles

Multisectoral interventions and health system performance: a systematic review.

Sutarsa I, Campbell L, Ariawan I, Kasim R, Marten R, Rajan D Bull World Health Organ. 2024; 102(7):521-532F.

PMID: 38933474 PMC: 11197648. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.23.291246.


Health in All Policies at the Local Level: What Facilitates Success? Comment on "A Realist Explanatory Case Study Investigating How Common Goals, Leadership, and Committed Staff Facilitate Health in All Policies Implementation in the Municipality of....

Williams C, Valentine N Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 12:7975.

PMID: 38618812 PMC: 10590249. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7975.


The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies.

Cairney P, St Denny E, Mitchell H Open Res Eur. 2023; 1:23.

PMID: 37645203 PMC: 10445916. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13178.2.


A Realist Explanatory Case Study Investigating How Common Goals, Leadership, and Committed Staff Facilitate Health in All Policies Implementation in the Municipality of Kuopio, Finland.

Guglielmin M, Shankardass K, Bayoumi A, OCampo P, Kokkinen L, Muntaner C Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022; 11(11):2651-2659.

PMID: 35247936 PMC: 9818123. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6355.


Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review.

Such E, Smith K, Woods H, Meier P Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022; 11(12):2780-2792.

PMID: 35219286 PMC: 10105187. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550.


References
1.
Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, Macdougall C, Lawless A, van Eyk H, Williams C . Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian Health in All Policies on what encourages other sectors' involvement. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):811. PMC: 5644129. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4821-7. View

2.
Litman T . Transportation and public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013; 34:217-33. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114502. View

3.
Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, Herriot M . Applying Health in All Policies to obesity in South Australia. Health Promot Int. 2014; 31(1):44-58. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau064. View

4.
Baum F, Lawless A, Macdougall C, Delany T, McDermott D, Harris E . New norms new policies: Did the Adelaide Thinkers in Residence scheme encourage new thinking about promoting well-being and Health in All Policies?. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 147:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.031. View

5.
van Eyk H, Harris E, Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, Lawless A, Macdougall C . Health in All Policies in South Australia-Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(11). PMC: 5707927. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111288. View