» Articles » PMID: 30657538

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Associated With In-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30657538
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Studies of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurring outside the hospital have informed approaches to addressing risk, treatment, and patient outcomes. Similar insights for in-hospital AMI are lacking.

Objective: To determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with in-hospital AMI.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Cohort, nested case-control, and matched cohort study of patients hospitalized in US Veterans Health Administration facilities between July 2007 and September 2009. The incidence of in-hospital AMI was determined from a complete cohort of in-hospital AMI relative to the total number of inpatient admissions. From the in-hospital AMI cohort, detailed medical record review was performed on 687 cases and 687 individually matched controls. Risk factors and outcomes associated with in-hospital AMI were determined from matched comparison of in-hospital AMI cases to hospitalized controls.

Exposures: Candidate risk factors for in-hospital AMI included characteristics at the time of admission and in-hospital variables prior to the index date.

Main Outcomes And Measures: In the determination of the incidence and risk factors associated with in-hospital AMI, the outcome of interest was in-hospital AMI. All-cause mortality was the main outcome of interest following in-hospital AMI.

Results: A total of 5556 patients with in-hospital AMI (mean [SD] age, 73 [10] years; 5456 [98.2%] male) were identified among 1.3 million admissions, with an incidence of 4.27 in-hospital AMI events per 1000 admissions. Independent risk factors associated with in-hospital AMI included intensive care unit setting, history of coronary artery disease, heart rate greater than 100 beats/min, hemoglobin level less than 8 g/dL, and white blood cell count 14 000/μL or greater. Compared with the matched control group, mortality was significantly higher for patients with in-hospital AMI (in-hospital mortality, 26.4% vs 4.2%; 30-day mortality, 33.0% vs 10.0%; 1-year mortality, 59.2% vs 34.4%).

Conclusions And Relevance: In-hospital AMI was common and associated with common cardiovascular risk factors and markers of acute illness. Patient outcomes following in-hospital AMI were poor, with 1-year mortality approaching 60%. Further study of in-hospital AMI may yield opportunities to reduce in-hospital AMI risk and improve patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using cardiac obesity marker-epicardial adipose tissue mass index: a prospective cohort study.

Liu Z, Wang J, Yang Y, Cheng J, Yang M, Zhang Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1539500.

PMID: 40013125 PMC: 11861378. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1539500.


The short-term outcomes and risk factors of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture: a multi-center retrospective Study.

Luo W, Wen L, Zhang J, Zhao J, Wang Z, Luo X J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):571.

PMID: 39354610 PMC: 11443645. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-03077-z.


A Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Outpatient Clinical Phenotypes Predictive of First Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Hodgman M, Minoccheri C, Mathis M, Wittrup E, Najarian K Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202229 PMC: 11353976. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161741.


Smoking and Hypertriglyceridemia Predict ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kosovo Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Poniku A, Batalli A, Shita D, Rexhaj Z, Ferati A, Leka R Clin Pract. 2024; 14(3):1149-1158.

PMID: 38921269 PMC: 11202547. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14030091.


Comparison between Invasive Intervention and Conservative Treatment in Patients with In-Hospital Myocardial Infarctions: Results from the Regional Myocardial Infarction Registry of Saxony-Anhalt (RHESA) Study.

Assaf M, Costa D, Efremov L, Holland K, Mikolajczyk R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673467 PMC: 11050707. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082194.


References
1.
Maynard C, Lowy E, Rumsfeld J, Sales A, Sun H, Kopjar B . The prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(13):1410-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1410. View

2.
Bradley S, Huszti E, Warren S, Merchant R, Sayre M, Nichol G . Duration of hospital participation in Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation and survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2012; 83(11):1349-57. PMC: 3712823. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.03.014. View

3.
Chan P, Berg R, Spertus J, Schwamm L, Bhatt D, Fonarow G . Risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(7):601-9. PMC: 3769937. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.051. View

4.
Dai X, Bumgarner J, Spangler A, Meredith D, Smith S, Stouffer G . Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients hospitalized for noncardiac conditions. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013; 2(2):e000004. PMC: 3647284. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000004. View

5.
Thygesen K, Alpert J, White H, Jaffe A, Apple F, Galvani M . Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007; 116(22):2634-53. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397. View