» Articles » PMID: 30655869

Imaging Features of Primary Spinal Osseous Tumors and Their Value in Clinical Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30655869
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explored the method of imaging diagnosis of primary spinal osseous tumors and the application value of imaging in clinical diagnosis. Sixty-nine patients with primary spinal osseous tumors who received treatment in Nankai Hospital from July 2016 to June 2017 were selected. All of them received X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to analyze the imaging features of the three examination methods. Sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive predictive value (PV), negative predictive value (PV) and accuracy (Acc) were compared. The consistency of the three examination methods in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors was analyzed. Sen, Acc and PV of the three examination methods in diagnosing spinal osseous tumors had obvious differences. MRI showed the highest Sen (P<0.05). MRI had relatively high consistency with CT scan in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors, and κ-value was 0.72. CT scan and X-ray had obvious difference in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors (P<0.05). The consistency between CT scan and X-ray in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors was relatively low, and κ-value was 0.47. MRI and X-ray had obvious difference in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors (P<0.05). The consistency between MRI and X-ray in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors was relatively low, and κ-value was 0.41. X-ray examination is easy to operate with high resolution. CT scan has obvious advantages in displaying lesions with complex structure, many of which locate in overlapping sites. MRI has more advantages and higher accuracy in judging the scope of the tumor. CT and MRI examinations have obviously higher efficacy than X-ray in diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors. They are conducive in improving the accuracy of diagnosing primary spinal osseous tumors.

Citing Articles

Use of Carbon Fiber Implants to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumor Patients.

Lam F, Guru S, AbuReesh D, Hori Y, Chuang C, Liu L Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002531 PMC: 11852773. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020199.


The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Ruiz Santiago F, Lainez Ramos-Bossini A, Wang Y, Barbero J, Garcia Espinosa J, Martinez Martinez A Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(7):3947-3986.

PMID: 35782254 PMC: 9246762. DOI: 10.21037/qims-2022-04.


Interventional Treatment of Bronchiectasis Macrosomia Based on Multirow CT Tomography Monitoring.

Lu D, Chai W, Gao X, Yan X J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:9116765.

PMID: 34925743 PMC: 8677367. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9116765.


Kyphoplasty in the treatment of occult and non-occult metastatic vertebral tumors.

He S, Zhou Z, Zhang C, Lv N, Qian Z, Sun Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(25):e20430.

PMID: 32569166 PMC: 7310909. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020430.

References
1.
Klinaki I, Al-Nahhas A, Soneji N, Win Z . 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT uptake in spinal lesions and MRI correlation on a patient with neuroendocrine tumor: potential pitfalls. Clin Nucl Med. 2013; 38(12):e449-53. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a2325. View

2.
Sahinarslan A, Erbas G, Kocaman S, Bas D, Akyel A, Karaer D . Comparison of radiation-induced damage between CT angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Acta Cardiol. 2013; 68(3):291-7. DOI: 10.1080/ac.68.3.2983424. View

3.
Ganten M, Schuessler M, Bauerle T, Muenter M, Schlemmer H, Jensen A . The role of perfusion effects in monitoring of chemoradiotherapy of rectal carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging. Cancer Imaging. 2013; 13(4):548-56. PMC: 3864228. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0045. View

4.
Chou C, Chen R, Lin W, Ko C, Chen C, Chen Y . Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative CT and histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203(3):W253-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10595. View

5.
DAndrea K, Dreyer J, Fahim D . Utility of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Coregistered with Intraoperative Computed Tomographic Scan for the Resection of Complex Tumors of the Spine. World Neurosurg. 2015; 84(6):1804-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.072. View