» Articles » PMID: 30655004

A Latent Class Analysis of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Patients at a Long-term Acute Care Hospital: Subtype Differences in Clinical Outcomes

Overview
Journal Heart Lung
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30655004
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) at Long-Term Acute Care Hospital's (LTACHs) are clinically heterogeneous making it difficult to manage care and predict clinical outcomes.

Objectives: Identify and describe subgroups of patients on PMV at LTACHs and examine for group differences.

Methods: Latent class analysis was completed on data obtained during medical record review at Midwestern LTACH.

Main Results: A three-class solution was identified. Class 1 contained young, obese patients with low clinical and co-morbid burden; Class 2 contained the oldest patients with low clinical burden but multiple co-morbid conditions; Class 3 contained patients with multiple clinical and co-morbid burdens. There were no differences in LTACH length of stay [F(2,246) = 2.243, p = 0.108] or number of ventilator days [F(2,246) = 0.641, p = 0.528]. Class 3 patients were less likely to wean from mechanical ventilation [χ(2, N = 249) = 25.48, p < 0.001] and more likely to die [χ(2, N = 249) = 23.68, p < 0.001].

Conclusion: Patient subgroups can be described that predict clinical outcomes. Class 3 patients are at higher risk for poor clinical outcomes when compared to patients in Class 1 or Class 2.

Citing Articles

The relationship between dyadic coping and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients and spouses: based on potential profile analysis.

Zhang Y, Gao Y, Zhang N, Xu K, Zhao S BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):860.

PMID: 39614210 PMC: 11606235. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06289-8.


Characteristics and Risk Factors of Children Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation vs. Non-prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in the PICU: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

Liu Y, Wang Q, Hu J, Zhou F, Liu C, Li J Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:830075.

PMID: 35211431 PMC: 8861196. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.830075.


Distinct dyadic coping profiles in Chinese couples with breast cancer.

Cai T, Qian J, Huang Q, Yuan C Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29(11):6459-6468.

PMID: 33900457 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06237-2.

References
1.
Poulos C, Magee C, Bashford G, Eagar K . Determining level of care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:291. PMC: 3212985. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-291. View

2.
Damuth E, Mitchell J, Bartock J, Roberts B, Trzeciak S . Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3(7):544-53. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00150-2. View

3.
Lewis O, Ngwa J, Kibreab A, Phillpotts M, Thomas A, Mehari A . Body Mass Index and Intensive Care Unit Outcomes in African American Patients. Ethn Dis. 2017; 27(2):161-168. PMC: 5398175. DOI: 10.18865/ed.27.2.161. View

4.
Hotes L, Kalman E . The evolution of care for the chronically critically ill patient. Clin Chest Med. 2001; 22(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-5231(05)70022-8. View

5.
Dennis D, Bharat C, Paterson T . Prevalence of obesity and the effect on length of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care patients: A single site observational study. Aust Crit Care. 2016; 30(3):145-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.07.003. View