» Articles » PMID: 30654704

Development and Validation of the Real-World Progression in Diabetes (RAPIDS) Model

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30654704
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To develop and validate the first real-world data-based type 2 diabetes progression model (RAPIDS) employing econometric techniques that can study the comparative effects of complex dynamic patterns of glucose-lowering drug use.

Methods: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical record and claims databases were used to identify over 500,000 diabetes patients in 2003 with up to 9-year follow-up. The RAPIDS model contains interdependent first-order Markov processes over quarters for each of the micro- and macrovascular events, hypoglycemia, and death, as well as predictive models for 8 biomarker levels. Model parameters varied by static demographic factors and dynamic factors, such as age, duration of diabetes, 13 possible glucose-lowering treatment combinations, any blood pressure and any cholesterol-lowering medications, and cardiovascular history. To illustrate model capabilities, a simple comparative study was set up to compare observed treatment use patterns to alternate patterns if perfect adherence is assumed following initiating the use of any of these medications.

Results: Data were randomly split into 307,288, 105,195, and 105,081 patients to perform estimation, out-of-sample calibration, and validation, respectively. Model predictions in the validation sample closely aligned with the observed longitudinal trajectory of biomarkers and outcomes. Perfect adherence among initiators increased proportion of days covered by only 6 months. Most of this increase came from increased adherence to monotherapies and did not lead to meaningful changes in any of the outcomes over the 9-year period.

Conclusion: Future value of increasing medication adherence among VA patients with diabetes may lie among those who never initiate treatment or are late in initiating treatment. The first-of-its-kind real-world data-based model has the potential to carry out many complex comparative-effectiveness research (CER) studies of dynamic glucose-lowering drug regimens.

Citing Articles

Using Joint Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Models to Improve the Parameterization of Chronic Disease Microsimulation Models: an Application to Cardiovascular Disease.

Giardina J, Haneuse S, Pandya A medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574877 PMC: 11581079. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.27.24316240.


Updating and calibrating the Real-World Progression In Diabetes (RAPIDS) model in a non-Veterans Affairs population.

Basu A, Montano-Campos F, Huang E, Laiteerapong N, Barthold D Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(11):5261-5271.

PMID: 39223846 PMC: 11479577. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15878.


Development and Validation of the US Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Disease Microsimulation (DOC-M) Model: Health Disparity and Economic Impact Model.

Kim D, Wang L, Lauren B, Liu J, Marklund M, Lee Y Med Decis Making. 2023; 43(7-8):930-948.

PMID: 37842820 PMC: 10625721. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231196916.


Protocol for an observational cohort study investigating personalised medicine for intensification of treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the PERMIT study.

Bidulka P, ONeill S, Basu A, Wilkinson S, Silverwood R, Charlton P BMJ Open. 2021; 11(9):e046912.

PMID: 34580091 PMC: 8477338. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046912.


The sequence of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: pathways to and predictors of tocilizumab monotherapy.

Solomon D, Xu C, Collins J, Kim S, Losina E, Yau V Arthritis Res Ther. 2021; 23(1):26.

PMID: 33446261 PMC: 7807904. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02408-4.


References
1.
Turner R, Cull C, Frighi V, Holman R . Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. JAMA. 1999; 281(21):2005-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.21.2005. View

2.
Cramer J . A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(5):1218-24. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1218. View

3.
Miller D, Safford M, Pogach L . Who has diabetes? Best estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs based on computerized patient data. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 Suppl 2:B10-21. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.suppl_2.b10. View

4.
Palmer A, Roze S, Valentine W, Minshall M, Foos V, Lurati F . The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004; 20 Suppl 1:S5-26. DOI: 10.1185/030079904X1980. View

5.
. Guidelines for computer modeling of diabetes and its complications. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(9):2262-5. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.9.2262. View