» Articles » PMID: 30652599

Implementing an Electronic Data Capture System to Improve Clinical Workflow in a Large Academic Radiation Oncology Practice

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 18
PMID 30652599
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the feasibility and benefits of implementing a custom radiation oncology electronic data capture (EDC) system in a large academic radiation oncology practice.

Patients And Methods: A Web-based point-and-click EDC known as Brocade was internally developed and implemented systemwide in 2016. Brocade captures key data elements, such as stage, histology, and patient and treatment characteristics; links this information to radiation dose data extracted from the record and verify system; and creates clinical notes that are automatically exported to the hospital electronic health record. We report the number of unique radiation episodes captured by Brocade in its first full year of implementation and describe the notes generated, toxicities captured, compliance with staging and quality assurance, and time of day in which documentation occurred with Brocade versus our prior human transcription system.

Results: A median of 756 radiation episodes per month was captured for a total of 9,283 unique episodes captured in the first full year of implementation. The most common notes were for on-treatment visits (29,913) and simulations (13,220). Stage was captured for 92.2% of Brocade episodes (8,513 of 9,236) versus 29.7% of courses pre-Brocade (3,025 of 10,170; P < .001). Quality assurance was documented for 96.3% of completed courses (7,601 of 7,892). The most common grade ≥1 toxicities were pain (10,031), fatigue (7,490), and dermatitis (6,172). Brocade implementation was associated with a reduction in off-hours documentation and increase in the proportion of documentation created between 8:00 am and 12:00 pm.

Conclusion: Brocade is a reliable Web-based EDC tool that improves clinical documentation without detracting from clinical workflow. Moreover, Brocade has the advantage of capturing data in a structured manner that facilitates real-time analytics and outcome reporting.

Citing Articles

The Ugandan sickle Pan-African research consortium registry: design, development, and lessons.

Nsubuga M, Mutegeki H, Jjingo D, Munube D, Namazzi R, Opoka R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):212.

PMID: 39075479 PMC: 11285451. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02618-9.


Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study.

Salama V, Youssef S, Xu T, Wahid K, Chen J, Rigert J Oral Oncol Rep. 2024; 7.

PMID: 38638130 PMC: 11025722. DOI: 10.1016/j.oor.2023.100092.


Infrastructure tools to support an effective Radiation Oncology Learning Health System.

Kapoor R, Sleeman 4th W, Ghosh P, Palta J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(10):e14127.

PMID: 37624227 PMC: 10562037. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14127.


The Utility of Oncology Information Systems for Prognostic Modelling in Head and Neck Cancer.

Kotevski D, Smee R, Field M, Broadley K, Vajdic C J Med Syst. 2023; 47(1):9.

PMID: 36640212 PMC: 9840592. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-01907-6.


Supporting Structured Data Capture for Patients With Cancer: An Initiative of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program to Improve Capture of Malignant Diagnosis and Cancer Staging Data.

Emamekhoo H, Carroll C, Stietz C, Pier J, Lavitschke M, Mulkerin D JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022; 6:e2200020.

PMID: 35802837 PMC: 9296185. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.22.00020.


References
1.
Sledge G, Hudis C, Swain S, Yu P, Mann J, Hauser R . ASCO's approach to a learning health care system in oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2013; 9(3):145-8. PMC: 3651563. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000957. View

2.
Liede A, Hernandez R, Roth M, Calkins G, Larrabee K, Nicacio L . Validation of International Classification of Diseases coding for bone metastases in electronic health records using technology-enabled abstraction. Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 7:441-8. PMC: 4646479. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S92209. View

3.
Shen X, Dicker A, Doyle L, Showalter T, Harrison A, DesHarnais S . Pilot study of meaningful use of electronic health records in radiation oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2012; 8(4):219-23. PMC: 3396817. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000382. View

4.
Litchfield J, Freeman J, Schou H, Elsley M, Fuller R, Chubb B . Is the future for clinical trials internet-based? A cluster randomized clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2005; 2(1):72-9. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn069oa. View

5.
Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y . The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12(5):505-16. PMC: 1205599. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1700. View