» Articles » PMID: 30651098

Selection and Academic Success of Medical Students in Hamburg, Germany

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2019 Jan 18
PMID 30651098
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Student selection at Hamburg medical school is based on the combination of a natural science knowledge test (HAM-Nat) and pre-university educational attainment.

Method: Of the 1565 medical students enrolled in Hamburg from 2012 to 2015 about half were admitted by an entrance test, half by quotas. First, we analysed sociodemographic determinants of entrance test performance. Then, we used regression analysis to describe the interplay of variables in the prediction of study outcome, the role of sociodemographic factors, and differences in the calibration of educational attainment specific to German federal states.

Results: Better performance in the entrance test was associated with age over 21, male gender, German nationality, first language German and both parents holding an academic degree - effect sizes were small. No differences were found for the birthplaces of parents (a proxy for migration background). Study outcome differed considerably among admission paths: Students admitted by entrance test or the quota for excellent pre-university educational attainment performed markedly better during the first 3 terms than students admitted by the waiting list quota and the quota for foreign students. Gender differences in study outcome were slight with better performance by males. The relation of pre-university educational attainment to study outcome was moderated by the federal state in which secondary schooling took place. Methods for the equating of state-specific grades are explored. The predictive validity of the HAM-Nat after correction for range restriction was r = .31. The relatively low value of this coefficient may be attributed to 3 factors: 1. self-selection of applicants which leads to a validity-enhancing effect that is not revealed by the predictor-outcome correlation, 2. reduction of variance due to a high selection ratio, and 3. high test difficulty, exceeding the demands of the medical curriculum.

Conclusion: The HAM-Nat achieves a small amount of incremental validity over pre-university educational attainment. This effect, obtained from correlational analysis, underestimates the validity of the test, because it does not reflect the role of self-selection and other validity enhancing features of the selection process.

Citing Articles

[Integration of natural sciences and basic medical subjects in the integrated dentistry program (iMED DENT) at the University of Hamburg].

Bender R, Bruhn N, Eisenbarth S, Lemke R, Pantke C, Hampe W Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023; 66(12):1353-1362.

PMID: 37964045 PMC: 10667154. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-023-03795-0.


German Physicians and Medical Students Do Not Represent the Population They Serve.

Groene O, Huelmann T, Hampe W, Emami P Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 37372780 PMC: 10298415. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121662.


Admission criteria and academic performance in medical school.

Tamimi A, Hassuneh M, Tamimi I, Juweid M, Shibli D, Almasri B BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):273.

PMID: 37085824 PMC: 10122404. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04251-y.


Clinical experience can compensate for inferior academic achievements in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination.

Tsikas S, Afshar K BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):167.

PMID: 36927361 PMC: 10022153. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04082-x.


Admission Grades as Predictors of Medical Students' Academic Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.

Hendi A, Mahfouz M, Alqassim A, Makeen A, Somaili M, Shami M Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022; 12(11):1572-1580.

PMID: 36354589 PMC: 9689424. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe12110110.


References
1.
Vaglum P, Ekeberg O . Motivation for medical school: the relationship to gender and specialty preferences in a nationwide sample. Med Educ. 1999; 33(4):236-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00293.x. View

2.
James D, Chilvers C . Academic and non-academic predictors of success on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course 1970-1995. Med Educ. 2001; 35(11):1056-64. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01042.x. View

3.
Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L . Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002; 324(7343):952-7. PMC: 102330. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952. View

4.
Arulampalam W, Naylor R, Smith J . Factors affecting the probability of first year medical student dropout in the UK: a logistic analysis for the intake cohorts of 1980-92. Med Educ. 2004; 38(5):492-503. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2929.2004.01815.x. View

5.
Duckworth A, Seligman M . Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci. 2005; 16(12):939-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x. View