» Articles » PMID: 30649973

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in the First-line Treatment of Squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in the US

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2019 Jan 17
PMID 30649973
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To describe the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel; P + C) in metastatic, squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the US. A model comparing P + C versus C alone is developed utilizing partitioned survival analysis. Primary clinical efficacy, treatment utilization, health utility and safety data are derived from the KEYNOTE-407 trial and projected over 20 years. Costs for drugs and non-drug disease management are also incorporated. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of P + C vs. pembrolizumab monotherapy (P) is evaluated via an indirect treatment comparison, for patient subgroups with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 50% and 1-49%. Overall, P + C is projected to increase life expectancy by 1.95 years vs. C (3.86 versus 1.91). The resultant ICER is $86,293/QALY. In patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 1-49% and <1 the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are $99,777/QALY, $85,986/QALY and $87,507/QALY, respectively. Versus P, in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% subgroup, P + C appears cost saving; however, this result should be interpreted with caution as there is considerable uncertainty in the relative efficacy of these comparators. Across all eligible patients, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy is projected to approximately double life expectancy, yielding an extension to a point not previously seen in metastatic squamous NSCLC. Overall, and within all relevant PD-L1 subgroups, use of P + C yields an ICER below $100,000/QALY, and can be a cost-effective first-line treatment for eligible metastatic squamous NSCLC patients for whom chemotherapy is currently administered. In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% subgroup, additional follow-up within trials of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy are needed to better define cost-effectiveness between these comparators.

Citing Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Courtney P, Venkat P, Shih Y, Chang A, Lee A, Steinberg M JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250033.

PMID: 40036034 PMC: 11880949. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0033.


Cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer from the US healthcare sector's and societal perspectives.

Gan Y, Shi F, Zhu H, Li H, Han S, Li D Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1256992.

PMID: 38915475 PMC: 11194367. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1256992.


First-line treatments for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Tian W, Niu L, Shi Y, Li S, Zhou R Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241255613.

PMID: 38827178 PMC: 11143870. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241255613.


Cost-effectiveness of additional serplulimab to chemotherapy in metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Zheng H, Zeng Y, Wen F, Hu M Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1382088.

PMID: 38711525 PMC: 11070458. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1382088.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Meng M, Liu X, Liang X, Chen X, Li Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(16):e37836.

PMID: 38640325 PMC: 11029999. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037836.