» Articles » PMID: 30646254

Analysis of a Commercial Insurance Policy to Deny Coverage for Emergency Department Visits With Nonemergent Diagnoses

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jan 16
PMID 30646254
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Insurers have increasingly adopted policies to reduce emergency department (ED) visits that they consider unnecessary. One common approach is to retrospectively deny coverage if the ED discharge diagnosis is determined by the insurer to be nonemergent.

Objective: To characterize ED visits that may be denied coverage if the ED coverage denial policy of a large national insurer, Anthem, Inc, is widely adopted.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of probability-sampled ED visits from the nationally representative National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED subsample occurring from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015, was conducted. Visits by commercially insured patients aged 15 to 64 years were examined. Those with ED discharge diagnoses defined by Anthem's policy as nonemergent and therefore subject to possible denial of coverage were classified as denial diagnosis visits. The primary presenting symptoms among denial diagnosis visits were identified, and all visits by commercially insured adults presenting with these primary symptoms were classified as denial symptom visits.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Each visit cohort as a weighted proportion of commercially insured adult ED visits. The proportion of each visit cohort that received ED-level care, defined as visits where patients were triaged as urgent or emergent, received 2 or more diagnostic tests, or were admitted or transferred, was also examined.

Results: From 2011 to 2015, 15.7% (95% CI, 15.0%-16.4%) of commercially insured adult ED visits (4440 of 28 304) were denial diagnosis visits (mean [SD] patient age, 36.6 [14.0] years; 2592 [58.7%] female and 2962 [63.5%] white). Among these visits, 39.7% (95% CI, 37.1%-42.3%) received ED-level care: 24.5% (95% CI, 21.7%-27.4%) were initially triaged as urgent or emergent and 26.0% (95% CI, 23.8%-28.3%) received 2 or more diagnostic tests. These denial diagnosis visits shared the same presenting symptoms as 87.9% (95% CI, 87.3%-88.4%) of commercially insured adult ED visits (24 882 of 28 304) (mean [SD] patient age, 38.5 [14.1] years; 14 362 [57.9%] female and 17 483 [68.7%] white). Among these denial symptom visits, 65.1% (95% CI, 63.4%-66.9%) received ED-level care: 43.2% (95% CI, 40.2%-46.4%) were triaged as urgent or emergent, 51.9% (95% CI, 50.0%-53.9%) received 2 or more diagnostic tests, and 9.7% (95% CI, 8.8%-10.6%) were admitted or transferred.

Conclusions And Relevance: Anthem's nonemergent ED discharge diagnoses were not associated with identification of unnecessary ED visits when assessed from the patient's perspective. This cost-reduction policy could place many patients who reasonably seek ED care at risk of coverage denial.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Validity of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Measure in Identifying Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits by Patients With Cancer.

Tabriz A, Turner K, Hemati H, Baugh C, Lafata J JCO Oncol Pract. 2024; 21(2):218-225.

PMID: 39038257 PMC: 11834964. DOI: 10.1200/OP.24.00160.


Identifying low acuity Emergency Department visits with a machine learning approach: The low acuity visit algorithms (LAVA).

Chen A, Kuzma R, Friedman A Health Serv Res. 2024; 59(4):e14305.

PMID: 38553999 PMC: 11249839. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14305.


Plastic Surgery Tourism: Complications, Costs, and Unnecessary Spending?.

Hery D, Schwarte B, Patel K, Elliott J, Vasko S Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024; 6:ojad113.

PMID: 38213470 PMC: 10783483. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojad113.


Emergency Medicine Resident Needs Assessment and Preferences for a High-value Care Curriculum.

Lane B, Mand S, Wright S, Santen S, Punches B West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(1):43-50.

PMID: 38205984 PMC: 10777185. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.59622.


Concordance in Medical Urgency Classification of Discharge Diagnoses and Reasons for Visit.

Giannouchos T, Ukert B, Wright B JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(1):e2350522.

PMID: 38198140 PMC: 10782231. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50522.


References
1.
Limm E, Fang X, Dendle C, Stuart R, Egerton Warburton D . Half of all peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain?. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62(5):521-525. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.022. View

2.
Asplin B . Undertriage, overtriage, or no triage? In search of the unnecessary emergency department visit. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38(3):282-5. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.117842. View

3.
Tang N, Stein J, Hsia R, Maselli J, Gonzales R . Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. JAMA. 2010; 304(6):664-70. PMC: 3123697. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1112. View

4.
McCaig L, Burt C, Schappert S, Albert M, Uddin S, Brown C . NHAMCS: does it hold up to scrutiny?. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62(5):549-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.028. View

5.
Ho V, Metcalfe L, Dark C, Vu L, Weber E, Shelton Jr G . Comparing Utilization and Costs of Care in Freestanding Emergency Departments, Hospital Emergency Departments, and Urgent Care Centers. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70(6):846-857.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.006. View