» Articles » PMID: 30645209

Stiffening and Ventricular-arterial Interaction in the Ascending Aorta Using MRI: Ageing Effects in Healthy Humans

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 2019 Jan 16
PMID 30645209
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age and sex on nPWV and ndI in the ascending aorta of healthy humans.

Background: Local pulse wave velocity (nPWV) and wave intensity (ndI) in the human ascending aorta have not been studied adequately, because of the need for invasive pressure measurements. However, a recently developed technique made the noninvasive determination of nPWV and ndI possible using measurements of flow velocity and arterial diameter.

Methods: Diameter and flow velocity were measured at the level of the ascending aorta in 144 healthy participants (aged 20-77 years, 66 men), using MRI. nPWV, ndI parameters; forward (FCW); backward (BCW) compression waves, forward decompression wave (FDW), local aortic distensibility (nDs) and reflection index (nRI) were calculated.

Results: nPWV increased significantly with age from 4.7 ± 0.3 m/s for those 20-30 years to 6.4 ± 0.2 m/s for those 70-80 years (P < 0.001) and did not differ between sexes. nDs decreased with age (5.3 ± 0.5 vs. 2.6 ± 0.2 10 1/Pa, P < 0.001) and nRI increased with age (0.17 ± 0.03 vs. 0.39 ± 0.06, P < 0.01) for those 20-30 and 70-80 years, respectively. FCW, BCW and FDW decreased significantly with age by 86.3, 71.3 and 74.2%, respectively (P < 0.001), all compared to the lowest age-band.

Conclusion: In healthy humans, ageing results in stiffer ascending aorta, with increase in nPWV and decrease in nDs. A decrease in FCW and FDW indicates decline in left ventricular early and late systolic functions with age in healthy humans with no differences between sexes. nRI is more sensitive than BCW in establishing the effects of ageing on reflected waves measured in the ascending aorta.

Citing Articles

Detecting heart failure from B-mode ultrasound characterization of arterial pulse waves.

Reavette R, Ramakrishnan A, Rowland E, Tang M, Mayet J, Weinberg P Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024; 327(1):H80-H88.

PMID: 38787379 PMC: 11398869. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00219.2024.


Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.

Alastruey J, Charlton P, Bikia V, Paliakaite B, Hametner B, Bruno R Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023; 325(1):H1-H29.

PMID: 37000606 PMC: 7614613. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00705.2022.


Measurement, Analysis and Interpretation of Pressure/Flow Waves in Blood Vessels.

Mynard J, Kondiboyina A, Kowalski R, Cheung M, Smolich J Front Physiol. 2020; 11:1085.

PMID: 32973569 PMC: 7481457. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01085.


On the accuracy of displacement-based wave intensity analysis: Effect of vessel wall viscoelasticity and nonlinearity.

Kang J, Aghilinejad A, Pahlevan N PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224390.

PMID: 31675382 PMC: 6824577. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224390.


Non-invasive assessment of ventriculo-arterial coupling using aortic wave intensity analysis combining central blood pressure and phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Bhuva A, DSilva A, Torlasco C, Nadarajan N, Jones S, Boubertakh R Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 21(7):805-813.

PMID: 31501858 PMC: 7306860. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez227.


References
1.
Parker K, Jones C, Dawson J, Gibson D . What stops the flow of blood from the heart?. Heart Vessels. 1988; 4(4):241-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02058593. View

2.
Weber T, Ammer M, Rammer M, Adji A, ORourke M, Wassertheurer S . Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens. 2009; 27(8):1624-30. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832cb04e. View

3.
Redheuil A, Yu W, Wu C, Mousseaux E, De Cesare A, Yan R . Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension. 2010; 55(2):319-26. PMC: 3035625. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.141275. View

4.
Millasseau S, Stewart A, Patel S, Redwood S, Chowienczyk P . Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate. Hypertension. 2005; 45(2):222-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000154229.97341.d2. View

5.
Feng J, Khir A . Determination of wave intensity in flexible tubes using measured diameter and velocity. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007:985-8. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352459. View