» Articles » PMID: 30637613

Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Enterococci Isolated from Broiler Flocks in Turkey

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Jan 15
PMID 30637613
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance, resistance mechanisms implicated, and virulence genes (asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl) of Enterococcus spp. isolated from broiler flocks in Turkey. In addition, clonality of ampicillin and vancomycin-resistant enterococci was also investigated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Out of 430 cloacal swab samples investigated, 336 (78.1%) Enterococcus spp. was isolated. The most frequently identified species were E. faecalis (87.8%), E. faecium (8.3%), E. durans (2.4%), E. casseliflavus (0.9%), and E. hirae (0.6%). The most common resistance was against tetracycline (81.3%), erythromycin (77.1%), ciprofloxacin (56.8%), and chloramphenicol (46.4%). Fifty (14.9%) isolates showed high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGL) phenotype. Ampicillin and vancomycin resistance were observed in 3.3% and 1.5% of the isolates, respectively. Two hundred eighty-three isolates were positive for the presence of virulence genes. Among the virulence genes tested, only gelE, asa1, esp, and cylA genes were detected. The most prevalent virulence gene was gelE (234, 69.6%), followed by asa1 (160, 47.6%), esp (37, 11%), and cylA (2, 0.6%). In conclusion, this study revealed that commensal enterococci from broiler flocks showed high rate of resistance to antimicrobials including clinically important antimicrobials for humans. The main underlying reason for high resistance could be attributed to the inappropriate and widespread use of antimicrobials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop control strategies to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Citing Articles

Antibiotic Resistance among Gastrointestinal Bacteria in Broilers: A Review Focused on spp. and .

Ribeiro J, Silva V, Monteiro A, Vieira-Pinto M, Igrejas G, Reis F Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37106925 PMC: 10135345. DOI: 10.3390/ani13081362.

References
1.
Morrison D, Woodford N, Barrett S, Sisson P, Cookson B . DNA banding pattern polymorphism in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and criteria for defining strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(4):1084-91. PMC: 88653. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.1084-1091.1999. View

2.
el Amin N, Jalal S, Wretlind B . Alterations in GyrA and ParC associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43(4):947-9. PMC: 89232. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.4.947. View

3.
Aarestrup F, Agerso Y, Gerner-Smidt P, Madsen M, Jensen L . Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000; 37(2):127-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00130-9. View

4.
Del Campo R, Tenorio C, Rubio C, Castillo J, Torres C, Gomez-Lus R . Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in high-level streptomycin and gentamicin resistant Enterococcus spp. in Spain. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000; 15(3):221-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00169-2. View

5.
Chow J . Aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31(2):586-9. DOI: 10.1086/313949. View