» Articles » PMID: 30634946

Indicators for Monitoring Maternal and Neonatal Quality Care: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Jan 13
PMID 30634946
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Research and different organizations have proposed indicators to monitor the quality of maternal and child healthcare, such indicators are used for different purposes.

Objective: To perform a systematic review of indicators for the central phases of the maternal and child healthcare continuum of care (pregnancy, childbirth, newborn care and postpartum).

Method: A search conducted using international repositories, national and international indicator sets, scientific articles published between 2012 and 2016, and grey literature. The eligibility criteria was documents in Spanish or English with indicators to monitor aspects of the continuum of care phases of interest. The identified indicators were characterized as follows: formula, justification, evidence level, pilot study, indicator type, phase of the continuum, intended organizational level of application, level of care, and income level of the countries. Selection was based on the characteristics associated with scientific soundness (formula, evidence level, and reliability).

Results: We identified 1791 indicators. Three hundred forty-six were duplicated, which resulted in 1445 indicators for analysis. Only 6.7% indicators exhibited all requirements for scientific soundness. The distribution by the classifying variables is clearly uneven, with a predominance of indicators for childbirth, hospital care and facility level.

Conclusions: There is a broad choice of indicators for maternal and child healthcare. However, most indicators lack demonstrated scientific soundness and refer to particular continuum phases and levels within the healthcare system. Additional efforts are needed to identify good indicators for a comprehensive maternal and child healthcare monitoring system.

Citing Articles

Measuring social, economic, policy, and health system determinants of maternal health and survival: An urgent global priority.

Jolivet R, Gausman J, Langer A PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317095.

PMID: 39792850 PMC: 11723637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317095.


Cross sectional survey of maternal and newborn quality of care in Niger: Selected findings, lessons learned and recommendations.

Quach A, Madaj B, Fahy K, Konate A, Souley I, Marcel L PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(11):e0003268.

PMID: 39536062 PMC: 11559989. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003268.


The association of Chinese and American antenatal care utilization indices with birth outcomes.

Zhou H, Yang Y, Chi P, Cheng H, Alifu X, Qiu Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1420943.

PMID: 39171300 PMC: 11335484. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420943.


Fetal outcomes and their correlates following caesarian section in a rural setting in Ghana.

Sackeya E, Beru M, Angmortey R, Opoku D, Boamah V, Appiah F PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0293029.

PMID: 37906541 PMC: 10617686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293029.


Maternal health and maternal health service utilization among female sex workers: A scoping review.

Moore B, Govaerts L, Kapadia F Womens Health (Lond). 2023; 19:17455057231206303.

PMID: 37899632 PMC: 10617279. DOI: 10.1177/17455057231206303.


References
1.
Sibanda T, Fox R, Draycott T, Mahmood T, Richmond D, Simms R . Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 166(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.09.018. View

2.
Tuncalp , Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gulmezoglu A, Bahl R . Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015; 122(8):1045-9. PMC: 5029576. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451. View

3.
Murray C . Choosing indicators for the health-related SDG targets. Lancet. 2015; 386(10001):1314-1317. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00382-7. View

4.
Carinci F, van Gool K, Mainz J, Veillard J, Pichora E, Januel J . Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015; 27(2):137-46. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv004. View

5.
Graham W, Varghese B . Quality, quality, quality: gaps in the continuum of care. Lancet. 2011; 379(9811):e5-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62267-2. View