» Articles » PMID: 30631770

Animal Welfare in Conservation Breeding: Applications and Challenges

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2019 Jan 12
PMID 30631770
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal welfare and conservation breeding have overlapping and compatible goals that are occasionally divergent. Efforts to improve enclosures, provide enriching experiences, and address behavioral and physical needs further the causes of animal welfare in all zoo settings. However, by mitigating stress, increasing behavioral competence, and enhancing reproduction, health, and survival, conservation breeding programs must also focus on preparing animals for release into the wild. Therefore, conservation breeding facilities must strike a balance of promoting high welfare, while minimizing the effects of captivity to increase population sustainability. As part of the Hawaii Endangered Bird Conservation Program, San Diego Zoo Global operates two captive breeding facilities that house a number of endangered Hawaiian bird species. At our facilities we aim to increase captive animal welfare through husbandry, nutrition, behavior-based enrichment, and integrated veterinary practices. These efforts help foster a captive environment that promotes the development of species-typical behaviors. By using the "Opportunities to Thrive" guiding principles, we outline an outcome-based welfare strategy, and detail some of the related management inputs, such as transitioning to parental rearing, and conducting veterinary exams remotely. Throughout we highlight our evidence-based approach for evaluating our practices, by monitoring welfare and the effectiveness of our inputs. Additionally we focus on some of the unique challenges associated with improving welfare in conservation breeding facilitates and outline concrete future steps for improving and evaluating welfare outcomes that also meet conservation goals.

Citing Articles

Making Work for Fishing Cat Conservation: A Blueprint for Connecting Populations across an Interactive Wild Ex Situ Spectrum.

Adhya T, Singh S, Gottumukkala H, Banerjee A, Chongder I, Maity S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39409720 PMC: 11475073. DOI: 10.3390/ani14192770.


Starting From Scratch: Husbandry Techniques to Establish the First Population of 'Akikiki (Oreomystis bairdi) in Human Care Using Wild-Collected Eggs.

Flanagan A, Masuda B, Pribble J, Dancil K, Kauka T, Tanaka C Zoo Biol. 2024; 43(6):585-589.

PMID: 39304995 PMC: 11624620. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21862.


The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's Approach to Assessing and Promoting Animal Welfare in Collaboration with Universities.

Gandia K, Elliott J, Girling S, Kessler S, Buchanan-Smith H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123748 PMC: 11311029. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152223.


Benchmarking Giant Panda Welfare in Tourism: A Co-Design Approach for Animals, Tourists, Managers, and Researchers.

Guo Y, Fennell D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123663 PMC: 11311010. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152137.


Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia.

Ghimire R, Brown J, Thitaram C, Bansiddhi P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1370909.

PMID: 38532794 PMC: 10964907. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909.


References
1.
Mason G, Cooper J, Clarebrough C . Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature. 2001; 410(6824):35-6. DOI: 10.1038/35065157. View

2.
Crissey S, Ward A, Block S, Maslanka M . Hepatic iron accumulation over time in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) fed two levels of iron. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2001; 31(4):491-6. DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260(2000)031[0491:HIAOTI]2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Blums P, Nichols J, Hines J, Lindberg M, Mednis A . Individual quality, survival variation and patterns of phenotypic selection on body condition and timing of nesting in birds. Oecologia. 2005; 143(3):365-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1794-x. View

4.
Ross S . Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behav Processes. 2006; 73(1):117-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.003. View

5.
Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen M, Moe R, Spruijt B, Keeling L . Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav. 2007; 92(3):375-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003. View