» Articles » PMID: 30631189

Contemporary Dental Practice in the UK. Part 1: Demography and Practising Arrangements in 2015

Overview
Journal Br Dent J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2019 Jan 12
PMID 30631189
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine, by means of an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire, the demographic profile and practising details of general dental practitioners in the UK in 2015.

Methods: A previously-piloted and validated 121-question questionnaire was distributed during 2015 to 500 dentists at UK dental meetings with a request that they complete the questionnaire and return it by post in the reply-paid envelope to the corresponding author.

Results: Three hundred and eighty-eight useable questionnaires were returned, giving aresponse rate of 77.6%. Of the respondents, 60.2% were male and 39.8% female. Theirmean age since graduation was 19.7 years. Just over half of the respondents (50.9%) replied that they were practice principals, 35.8% were associates and 10.6% were foundation dentists. A quarter of the respondents were in single-handed practices, the remainder being in a partnership or group practice. There was a mean of 4.2 dentists per practice, while the mean number of dental therapists in each practice was 0.3 and 1.2 hygienists. Regarding the first available NHS appointment in the respondents' practices for non-urgent care, 23.4% could provide this on the same day, the equivalent figure for private care being 40.1%. The mean percentage of patients receiving NHS treatment was 50%, with 33.8% receiving private treatment. Just over half of respondents considered that Care Quality Commission inspections were 'valuable for fostering patient trust and confidence in dental care.' The collected data indicated that 55.4% of respondents had an intra-oral camera, while, with regard to recently-introduced concepts and techniques, 80.4% used nickel-titanium files, 47.4% used zirconia-based bridgework and 24.9% used tricalcium silicate. Of great interest, perhaps, is the response to digital radiography/digital imaging, with the results indicating that 74.1% of respondents used this form of radiography. Regarding checking the light output of the light curing units, 53.1% stated that they did check the output, but in some cases this might be at a six-monthly interval.

Conclusion: Results from this survey indicated that NHS service provision has dropped toapproximately 50% amongst the respondents. Regarding the staffing of dentalpractices, just over half the respondents were practice principals and there was a mean of 4.2 dentists per practice. The results also indicated that UK dentists continue to be innovative in the techniques that they employ.

Citing Articles

Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers.

Maucoski C, Price R, Arrais C, Sullivan B PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0267359.

PMID: 35802759 PMC: 9269870. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267359.


Comparison of antimicrobial prescribing for dental and oral infections in England and Scotland with Norway and Sweden and their relative contribution to national consumption 2010-2016.

Smith A, Al-Mahdi R, Malcolm W, Palmer N, Dahlen G, Al-Haroni M BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):172.

PMID: 32546149 PMC: 7298788. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01163-x.


Latex and synthetic rubber glove usage in UK general dental practice: changing trends.

Critchley E, Pemberton M Heliyon. 2020; 6(5):e03889.

PMID: 32405551 PMC: 7210590. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03889.


Development and retention of the dental workforce: findings from a regional workforce survey and symposium in England.

Holmes R, Burford B, Vance G BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):255.

PMID: 32216779 PMC: 7099783. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4980-6.


Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.

Jumah A, Creanor S, Wilson N, Burke F, Brunton P Br Dent J. 2019; 226(3):192-196.

PMID: 30734749 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.95.


References
1.
Burke F, Wilson N, Christensen G, Cheung S, Brunton P . Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements. Br Dent J. 2005; 198(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811956. View

2.
Price R, Felix C, Whalen J . Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010; 76:a94. View

3.
Brunton P, Burke T, Sharif M, Muirhead E, Creanor S, Wilson N . Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic details and practising arrangements in 2008. Br Dent J. 2012; 212(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.1098. View

4.
Watson T, Atmeh A, Sajini S, Cook R, Festy F . Present and future of glass-ionomers and calcium-silicate cements as bioactive materials in dentistry: biophotonics-based interfacial analyses in health and disease. Dent Mater. 2013; 30(1):50-61. PMC: 3885799. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.202. View