» Articles » PMID: 30621604

The Assessment of Gestational Age: a Comparison of Different Methods from a Malaria Pregnancy Cohort in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Background: Determining gestational age in resource-poor settings is challenging because of limited availability of ultrasound technology and late first presentation to antenatal clinic. Last menstrual period (LMP), symphysio-pubis fundal height (SFH) and Ballard Score (BS) at delivery are therefore often used. We assessed the accuracy of LMP, SFH, and BS to estimate gestational age at delivery and preterm birth compared to ultrasound (US) using a large dataset derived from a randomized controlled trial in pregnant malaria patients in four African countries.

Methods: Mean and median gestational age for US, LMP, SFH and BS were calculated for the entire study population and stratified by country. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson's rho, and Bland Altman plots were used to calculate mean differences in findings with 95% limit of agreements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated considering US as reference method to identify term and preterm babies.

Results: A total of 1630 women with P. falciparum infection and a gestational age > 24 weeks determined by ultrasound at enrolment were included in the analysis. The mean gestational age at delivery using US was 38.7 weeks (95%CI: 38.6-38.8), by LMP, 38.4 weeks (95%CI: 38.0-38.9), by SFH, 38.3 weeks (95%CI: 38.2-38.5), and by BS 38.0 weeks (95%CI: 37.9-38.1) (p < 0.001). Correlation between US and any of the other three methods was poor to moderate. Sensitivity and specificity to determine prematurity were 0.63 (95%CI 0.50-0.75) and 0.72 (95%CI, 0.66-0.76) for LMP, 0.80 (95%CI 0.74-0.85) and 0.74 (95%CI 0.72-0.76) for SFH and 0.42 (95%CI 0.35-0.49) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.74-0.79) for BS.

Conclusions: In settings with limited access to ultrasound, and in women who had been treated with P. falciparum malaria, SFH may be the most useful antenatal tool to date a pregnancy when women present first in second and third trimester. The Ballard postnatal maturation assessment has a limited role and lacks precision. Improving ultrasound facilities and skills, and early attendance, together with the development of new technologies such as automated image analysis and new postnatal methods to assess gestational age, are essential for the study and management of preterm birth in low-income settings.

Citing Articles

Lower accuracy of estimated delivery date using last menstrual period recall and related factors of adverse events during childbirth: A sub-analysis of a birth cohort study in Makassar, Indonesia.

Wijaya E, Ansariadi , Hadju V, Sjahril R, Adisasmita A, Mallongi A Belitung Nurs J. 2024; 10(6):662-669.

PMID: 39601031 PMC: 11586618. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3590.


Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of postnatal clinical scoring methods and foot length measurement for estimating gestational age and birthweight of newborns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tikmani S, Martensson T, Khalid S, Uzair M, Ali Q, Rahim A BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024; 8(1).

PMID: 39214548 PMC: 11367336. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002717.


Gestational Dating by Urine Metabolic Profile at High Resolution Weekly Sampling Timepoints: Discovery and Validation.

Sylvester K, Hao S, Li Z, Han Z, Tian L, Ladella S Front Mol Med. 2024; 2:844280.

PMID: 39086969 PMC: 11285704. DOI: 10.3389/fmmed.2022.844280.


Preterm birth among women with HIV: impact of preconception cART initiation.

Duffy C, Herlihy J, Zulu E, Mwananyanda L, Forman L, Heeren T AIDS. 2024; 38(12):1749-1757.

PMID: 39017638 PMC: 11356690. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003979.


Problems with gestational age estimation by last menstrual period and ultrasound among late antenatal care attendant women in a low-resource setting in Africa, Sudan.

Alyahyawi A, Adam G, AlHabardi N, Adam I J Ultrasound. 2024; 27(1):129-135.

PMID: 38236459 PMC: 10909061. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-023-00844-x.


References
1.
Ballard J, Khoury J, WEDIG K, Wang L, Lipp R . New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991; 119(3):417-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6. View

2.
White L, Lee S, Stepniewska K, Simpson J, Dwell S, Arunjerdja R . Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(68):503-10. PMC: 3262426. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0376. View

3.
Papageorghiou A, Ohuma E, Gravett M, Hirst J, da Silveira M, Lambert A . International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries. BMJ. 2016; 355:i5662. PMC: 5098415. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5662. View

4.
Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, Herring A, Mabey D, Poole F . Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 4(12 Suppl):S20-32. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1570. View

5.
McClure E, Nathan R, Saleem S, Esamai F, Garces A, Chomba E . First look: a cluster-randomized trial of ultrasound to improve pregnancy outcomes in low income country settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:73. PMC: 3996090. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-73. View