» Articles » PMID: 30615160

Image-Guided Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2019 Jan 8
PMID 30615160
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Image guidance (IG) and robotics systems are becoming more widespread in their utilization and can be invaluable intraoperative adjuncts during spine surgery. Both are highly reliant upon stereotaxy and either pre- or intraoperative radiographic imaging. While user-operated IG systems have been commercially available longer and subsequently are more widely utilized across centers, robotics systems provide unique theoretical advantages over freehand and IG techniques for placing instrumentation within the spine. While there is a growing plethora of data showing that IG and robotic systems decrease the incidence of malpositioned screws, less is known about their impact on clinical outcomes. Both robotics and IG may be of particular value in cases of substantial deformity or complex anatomy. Indications for the use of these systems continue to expand with an increasing body of literature justifying their use in not only guiding thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement, but also in cases of cervical and pelvic instrumentation as well as spinal tumor resection. Both techniques also offer the potential benefit of reducing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the operating room staff, the surgeon, and the patient. As the use of IG and robotics in spine surgery continues to expand, these systems' value in improving surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes must be weighed against concerns over cost and workflow. As newer systems incorporating both real-time IG and robotics become more utilized, further research is necessary to better elucidate situations where these systems may be particularly beneficial in spine surgery.

Citing Articles

Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for avoiding errors in robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS).

Vitale M, Givens R, Malka M, Lu K, Zervos T, Lombardi J Spine Deform. 2025; .

PMID: 40032795 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-025-01060-9.


Standalone ultrasound-based highly visualized volumetric spine imaging for surgical navigation.

Hu X, Liu T, Zhang Z, Xiao X, Chen L, Wei G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4922.

PMID: 39929969 PMC: 11810997. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89440-z.


Current state and future perspectives of spinal navigation and robotics-an AO spine survey.

Motov S, Butenschoen V, Krauss P, Veeravagu A, Yoo K, Stengel F Brain Spine. 2025; 5():104165.

PMID: 39810924 PMC: 11732222. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104165.


Comparison of robot versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a Meta-analysis.

Kang Y, Wei L, Liu J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):1002.

PMID: 39639248 PMC: 11619668. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08088-4.


Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures after Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: a Meta-Analysis and a Validation Cohort.

Li H, Zou J, Yu J Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(6):948-961.

PMID: 39618530 PMC: 11604559. DOI: 10.4055/cios24086.