» Articles » PMID: 30614769

Clinical Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Perioperative Period of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Jan 8
PMID 30614769
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical application value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with the laparoscopic technique in the radical resection of colorectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer from June 2014 to June 2017 were selected and randomly divided into ERAS group (n = 100) and conventional (CON) group (n = 100). The ERAS group adopted enhanced recovery approach after surgery for perioperative treatment, while the CON group adopted a CON approach. The operation time, blood loss, first exhaust time, first defecation time, extubation time, complication rate (incision infection, pneumonia, gastric retention, anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction, etc.), scores of visual analog scale (VAS) 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, and nutritional status (albumin, total protein) 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery were compared and analyzed.

Results: Compared with the CON group, the ERAS group had significantly shorter first exhaust time, first defecation time, and extubation time (all P < .05). The incidence of overall complications in the ERAS group was less than those in the CON group (P < .05); and albumin and total protein were significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the CON group (both P < .05).

Conclusions: ERAS combined with laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible practice. It not only promoted the recovery of gastrointestinal function but also improved the perioperative nutritional status of patients.

Citing Articles

Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Kannan V, Ullah N, Geddada S, Ibrahiam A, Munaf Shakir Al-Qassab Z, Ahmed O Patient Saf Surg. 2025; 19(1):4.

PMID: 39819478 PMC: 11737126. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-024-00425-9.


Effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing on improving clinical outcomes in postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.

Song J, Cao J, Mao J, Wang J World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(7):2119-2126.

PMID: 39087108 PMC: 11287703. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2119.


The Effectiveness of Patient Education on Laparoscopic Surgery Postoperative Outcomes to Determine Whether Direct Coaching Is the Best Approach: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Maheta B, Shehabat M, Khalil R, Wen J, Karabala M, Manhas P JMIR Perioper Med. 2024; 7:e51573.

PMID: 38935953 PMC: 11240078. DOI: 10.2196/51573.


Effect of thermal insulation on preventing hypothermia during laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer.

Qian M, Ye Y, Zhou J Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(5):2158-2165.

PMID: 38883388 PMC: 11170595. DOI: 10.62347/BKBY6649.


The effect of early oral postoperative feeding on the recovery of intestinal motility after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Canzan F, Longhini J, Caliaro A, Cavada M, Mezzalira E, Paiella S Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1369141.

PMID: 38818132 PMC: 11137291. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1369141.