» Articles » PMID: 30611838

Five-Year Outcomes of a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study Using Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery for Patients With Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: To report toxicity outcomes, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse, and cumulative incidence posttreatment biopsy results among patients treated on a prospective dose escalation study using ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Methods And Materials: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in a phase 1 dose-escalation study to determine the tolerance of escalating radiation dose levels of SBRT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The initial dose level was 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions, and doses were then sequentially escalated to 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and 40 Gy. Eligibility criteria included only patients with low and intermediate risk, and the maximum prostate volume was 60 cm. Patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation were excluded. The median follow-up in survivors for the 4 dose levels was 5.9, 5.4, 4.1, and 3.5 years, respectively.

Results: The incidence of acute grade 2 rectal toxicities for dose levels 1 to 4 were 0%, 2.9%, 2.8%, and 11.4% respectively. No grade 3 or 4 acute rectal toxicities were observed. The incidence of acute grade 2 urinary toxicities for dose levels 1 to 4 were 16.7%, 22.9%, 8.3%, and 17.1%, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 acute urinary toxicities were observed. No grade 2 or higher rectal toxicities were observed. The incidence of late grade 2 urinary toxicities for dose levels 1 to 4 was 23.3%, 25.7%, 27.8%, and 31.4%, respectively. Only 1 late grade 3 urinary toxicity (urethral stricture) developed in the 40-Gy dose arm; the stricture was corrected with transurethral resection. No grade 4 late urinary toxicity was observed. The 5-year cumulative incidence of prostate-specific antigen failure for dose levels 1 to 4 was 15%, 6%, 0%, and 0%. The incidence of a 2-year positive posttreatment biopsy was 47.6%, 19.2%, 16.7%, and 7.7%, respectively for the 4 dose arms (P = .013).

Conclusions: SBRT doses ranging from 32.5 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions were well tolerated without severe urinary or rectal toxicities. Biopsy outcomes suggest improved rates of tumor clearance observed with higher doses.

Citing Articles

No disease left behind.

Arshad M, Lynch C, Katipally R, Pitroda S, Weichselbaum R Oncotarget. 2025; 16:163-166.

PMID: 40079896 PMC: 11906142. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28700.


MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Allegra A, Nicosia L, Rigo M, Bianchi N, Borgese R, Simone A Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025; 24:15330338241297231.

PMID: 39865869 PMC: 11770696. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241297231.


Proton Versus CyberKnife Therapy Planning for Hypofractionated Treatment of Prostate With Focal Boost.

Yeo I, Goughenour A, Cernica G, Nie W, Joo M, Wang P Int J Part Ther. 2024; 14:100635.

PMID: 39686974 PMC: 11647119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100635.


Current State of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Genitourinary Malignancies.

Sherry A, Desai N, Tang C Cancer J. 2024; 30(6):421-428.

PMID: 39589474 PMC: 11844808. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000750.


Feasibility of creating a daily adaptive plan using automatic DIR-created target and OARs contours in patients with prostate cancer magnetic-resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

Saito M, Abe K, Tsuneda M, Fujita Y, Abe Y, Nishimura T J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(6):845-850.

PMID: 39528305 PMC: 11630044. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae088.


References
1.
Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Le Prise E, Cosset J, Bougnoux A, Chauvet B . 70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 80(4):1056-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.049. View

2.
Mantz C . A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Using a Non-Robotic Linear Accelerator and Real-Time Target Tracking: Report of Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Disease Control Outcomes with 5-Year Minimum.... Front Oncol. 2014; 4:279. PMC: 4231837. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00279. View

3.
Zelefsky M, Chan H, Hunt M, Yamada Y, Shippy A, Amols H . Long-term outcome of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006; 176(4 Pt 1):1415-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.002. View

4.
Jones R, Hassan Rezaeian N, Desai N, Lotan Y, Jia X, Hannan R . Dosimetric comparison of rectal-sparing capabilities of rectal balloon vs injectable spacer gel in stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: lessons learned from prospective trials. Med Dosim. 2017; 42(4):341-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.07.002. View

5.
Dearnaley D, Jovic G, Syndikus I, Khoo V, Cowan R, Graham J . Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(4):464-73. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-3. View