Foraging Efficiency and Size Matching in a Plant-pollinator Community: the Importance of Sugar Content and Tongue Length

Overview

Journal Ecol Lett

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2019 Jan 5

PMID 30609161

Citations 31

Authors

Saskia G T Klumpers

Martina Stang

Peter G L Klinkhamer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A long-standing question in ecology is how species interactions are structured within communities. Although evolutionary theory predicts close size matching between floral nectar tube depth and pollinator proboscis length of interacting species, such size matching has seldom been shown and explained in multispecies assemblages. Here, we investigated the degree of size matching among Asteraceae and their pollinators and its relationship with foraging efficiency. The majority of pollinators, especially Hymenoptera, choose plant species on which they had high foraging efficiencies. When proboscides were shorter than nectar tubes, foraging efficiency rapidly decreased because of increased handling time. When proboscides were longer than nectar tubes, a decreased nectar reward rather than an increased handling time made shallow flowers more inefficient to visit. Altogether, this led to close size matching. Overall, our results show the importance of nectar reward and handling time as drivers of plant-pollinator network structure.

Citing Articles

Exploring Species for Resilience to Drought During the Critical Reproductive Stage.

Jockovic J, Grahovac N, Milovac Z, Jockovic M, Jocic S, Marjanovic Jeromela A Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40006890 PMC: 11859588. DOI: 10.3390/plants14040631.

Variation in flower morphology associated with higher bee diversity in urban green spaces.

Sinno S, MacInnis G, Lessard J, Ziter C Ecol Appl. 2024; 35(1):e3067.

PMID: 39609370 PMC: 11725627. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3067.

Pollinator functional group abundance and floral heterogeneity in an agroecological context affect mating patterns in a self-incompatible wild plant.

Labonte A, Le Corre V, Matejicek A, Felten E, Turpin M, Laurent E Am J Bot. 2024; 111(12):e16440.

PMID: 39592516 PMC: 11659934. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16440.

Reviving collapsed plant-pollinator networks from a single species.

Baruah G, Wittmann M PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(10):e3002826.

PMID: 39365839 PMC: 11482677. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002826.

Species morphology better predicts plant-hummingbird interactions across elevations than nectar traits.

Maglianesi M, Brenes E, Chaves-Elizondo N, Zuniga K, Castro Jimenez A, Barreto E Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2031):20241279.

PMID: 39317323 PMC: 11421924. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1279.

References

Haverkamp A, Bing J, Badeke E, Hansson B, Knaden M . Innate olfactory preferences for flowers matching proboscis length ensure optimal energy gain in a hawkmoth. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11644. PMC: 4869250. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11644. View

Anderson B, Pauw A, Cole W, Barrett S . Pollination, mating and reproductive fitness in a plant population with bimodal floral-tube length. J Evol Biol. 2016; 29(8):1631-42. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12899. View

Galetto L, Bernardello G . Floral nectaries, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in six ipomoea species (convolvulaceae) in relation to pollinators. Ann Bot. 2004; 94(2):269-80. PMC: 4242162. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch137. View

Anderson B, Terblanche J, Ellis A . Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10:204. PMC: 2927919. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-204. View

Anderson B, Johnson S . The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution. 2007; 62(1):220-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00275.x. View

Olesen J, Bascompte J, Dupont Y, Elberling H, Rasmussen C, Jordano P . Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1706):725-32. PMC: 3030842. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1371. View

Memmott J, Waser N, Price M . Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1557):2605-11. PMC: 1691904. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909. View

Johnson S, More M, Amorim F, Haber W, Frankie G, Stanley D . The long and the short of it: a global analysis of hawkmoth pollination niches and interaction networks. Funct Ecol. 2017; 31(1):101-115. PMC: 5363726. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12753. View

Vazquez D, Chacoff N, Cagnolo L . Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Ecology. 2009; 90(8):2039-46. DOI: 10.1890/08-1837.1. View

10.

Bolten A, Feinsinger P, Baker H, Baker I . On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia. 2017; 41(3):301-304. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377434. View

11.

Toju H, Sota T . Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. Am Nat. 2006; 167(1):105-17. DOI: 10.1086/498277. View

12.

Dawkins R, Krebs J . Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979; 205(1161):489-511. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. View

13.

Karolyi F, Morawetz L, Colville J, Handschuh S, Metscher B, Krenn H . Time management and nectar flow: flower handling and suction feeding in long-proboscid flies (Nemestrinidae: Prosoeca). Naturwissenschaften. 2013; 100(11):1083-93. PMC: 3843750. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1114-6. View

14.

. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects; and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 2018; 30(60):312-318. PMC: 5180317. View

15.

Herrera C . Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the "quantity" component in a plant-pollinator system. Oecologia. 2017; 80(2):241-248. DOI: 10.1007/BF00380158. View

16.

Hegland S, Totland O . Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia. 2005; 145(4):586-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6. View

17.

Stang M, Klinkhamer P, Waser N, Stang I, van der Meijden E . Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web. Ann Bot. 2009; 103(9):1459-69. PMC: 2701768. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp027. View

18.

Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melian C, Olesen J . The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(16):9383-7. PMC: 170927. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1633576100. View

19.

Stang M, Klinkhamer P, van der Meijden E . Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant-flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance?. Oecologia. 2006; 151(3):442-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0585-y. View

20.

Alexandersson R, Johnson S . Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1491):631-6. PMC: 1690929. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1928. View