» Articles » PMID: 30607981

Applying Item Response Theory Analysis to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a Low-Education Older Population

Overview
Journal Assessment
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2019 Jan 5
PMID 30607981
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The traditional application of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment uses total scores in defining cognitive impairment levels, without considering variations in item properties across populations. Item response theory (IRT) analysis provides a potential solution to minimize the effect of important confounding factors such as education. This research applies IRT to investigate the characteristics of Montreal Cognitive Assessment items in a randomly selected, culturally homogeneous sample of 1,873 older persons with diverse educational backgrounds. Any formal education was used as a grouping variable to estimate multiple-group IRT models. Results showed that item characteristics differed between people with and without formal education. Item functioning of the Cube, Clock Number, and Clock Hand items was superior in people without formal education. This analysis provided evidence that item properties vary with education, calling for more sophisticated modelling based on IRT to incorporate the effect of education.

Citing Articles

Conventional clock drawing tests have low to moderate reliability and validity for detecting subtle cognitive impairments in community-dwelling older adults.

Kehl-Floberg K, Marks T, Edwards D, Giles G Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1210585.

PMID: 37705561 PMC: 10495769. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1210585.


Assessing social competence and antisocial behaviors in children: item response theory analysis of the home and community social behavior scales.

Hukkelberg S, Andersson B BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):19.

PMID: 36694224 PMC: 9875445. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01045-1.


Validation of a short Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-15) in non-clinical subjects: psychometric properties and normative data.

Maggi G, Altieri M, Ilardi C, Santangelo G Neurol Sci. 2022; 43(8):4719-4727.

PMID: 35403939 PMC: 9349262. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06047-2.


Reliability coefficients for multiple group item response theory models.

Andersson B, Luo H, Marcq K Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022; 75(2):395-410.

PMID: 35229881 PMC: 9313586. DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12269.


Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Seeking a Single Cutoff Score May Not Be Optimal.

Yang C, Wang L, Hu H, Dong X, Wang Y, Yang F Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021:9984419.

PMID: 34616484 PMC: 8487840. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9984419.