» Articles » PMID: 30607389

Pseudonormal or Restrictive Filling Pattern of Left Ventricle Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Presenting As Acute Heart Failure

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 5
PMID 30607389
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In patients with acute heart failure (AHF), diastolic dysfunction, especially pseudonormal (PN) or restrictive filling pattern (RFP) of left ventricle (LV), is considered to be implicated in a poor prognosis. However, prognostic significance of diastolic dysfunction in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) has been rarely investigated in Korea.

Methods: We enrolled 138 patients with IHD presenting as AHF and sinus rhythm during echocardiographic study. Diastolic dysfunction of LV was graded as ≥ 2 (group 1) or 1 (group 2) according to usual algorithm using E/A ratio and deceleration time of mitral inflow, E'/A' ratio of tissue Doppler echocardiography and left atrial size.

Results: Patients in group 1 showed higher 2-year mortality rate (36.2% ± 6.7%) than those in group 2 (13.6% ± 4.5%; p = 0.008). Two-year mortality rate of patient with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (26.8% ± 6.0%) was not different from those with LVEF 40%-49% (28.0% ± 8.0%) or ≥ 50% (13.7% ± 7.4%; p = 0.442). On univariate analysis, PN or RFP of LV, higher stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were poor prognostic factors, but LVEF or older age ≥ 75 years did not predict 2-year mortality. On multivariate analysis, PN or RFP of LV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-5.84; p = 0.031), higher stage of CKD (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.17; p = 0.006) and higher NYHA functional class (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.11-2.94; p = 0.017) were still significant prognostic factors for 2-year mortality.

Conclusions: PN or RFP of LV was a more useful prognostic factor for long-term mortality than LVEF in patients with IHD presenting as AHF.

Citing Articles

Effect of left ventricular geometric remodeling on restrictive filling pattern and survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Adhyapak S, Thomas T, Jose M, Varghese K Indian Heart J. 2022; 74(3):206-211.

PMID: 35513044 PMC: 9244999. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.04.007.


Is heart failure misdiagnosed in hospitalized patients with preserved ejection fraction? From the European Society of Cardiology - Heart Failure Association EURObservational Research Programme Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.

Kaplon-Cieslicka A, Laroche C, Crespo-Leiro M, Coats A, Anker S, Filippatos G ESC Heart Fail. 2020; 7(5):2098-2112.

PMID: 32618139 PMC: 7524216. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12817.


Echocardiographic Hemodynamic Assessment in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: the Impact of Diastolic Remodeling on Long-term Prognosis.

Kim M J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 26(4):226-228.

PMID: 30607390 PMC: 6310759. DOI: 10.4250/jcvi.2018.26.e31.

References
1.
Kim S, Rhee S, Shim C, Kim J, Park S, Ko Y . Prognostic value of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide level on admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Coron Artery Dis. 2011; 22(3):153-7. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283423622. View

2.
Hadjadj S, Coisne D, Mauco G, Ragot S, Duengler F, Sosner P . Prognostic value of admission plasma glucose and HbA in acute myocardial infarction. Diabet Med. 2004; 21(4):305-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01112.x. View

3.
Whalley G, Gamble G, Doughty R . Restrictive diastolic filling predicts death after acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Heart. 2006; 92(11):1588-94. PMC: 1861228. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.083055. View

4.
Whalley G, Wasywich C, Walsh H, Doughty R . Role of echocardiography in the contemporary management of chronic heart failure. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2005; 3(1):51-70. DOI: 10.1586/14779072.3.1.51. View

5.
Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard V, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T . Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006; 113(6):e85-151. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600. View