» Articles » PMID: 30607259

Involving Young People in BRIGHTLIGHT from Study Inception to Secondary Data Analysis: Insights from 10 years of User Involvement

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Jan 5
PMID 30607259
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plain English Summary: Young people with cancer are often described as 'hard to reach', 'difficult to engage' and/or 'vulnerable'. Consequently, they are often over looked for patient and public involvement activities. We set out to involve young people with cancer to work as co-researchers in the design of the largest ever study of young people with cancer, called BRIGHTLIGHT. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people as co-researchers, collaborators, consultants and dissemination partners. We chronicle the key points of this 10-year journey, sharing our success, describing our challenges and the solutions we put in place; sharing also what worked and did not work. Here we share some of these experiences of involving young people in this research and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same.

Abstract: Young people with cancer, broadly those aged 13-24 years at diagnosis, warrant special attention; physiological and psychological growth creates complex psychosocial needs which neither adult nor child systems are suitably designed to deal with. Resulting from these needs, they are often described as 'vulnerable', 'hard to reach' and 'difficult to engage', and consequently are often over looked for patient and public involvement/engagement (PPIE) roles. In our study 'BRIGHTLIGHT', we set out to evaluate whether specialist care for young people adds value, ensuring young people were central to our PPIE activities. We believe that BRIGHTLIGHT is unique as a very large study of young people with cancer which has successfully overcome the challenges of including young people in the research process so we are confident that they have influenced every aspect of study design, conduct and dissemination. We chronicle a period of 10 years, over which we describe our approach and our methods to involving young people in PPIE activities in BRIGHTLIGHT. We describe the feasibility work, study set up, conduct and dissemination of our findings, and weave through our story of PPIE to illustrate its benefits. Through the narration of our experience we highlight significant points that both influenced and changed our direction of travel. We reflect on our experiences and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people. Their contributions have been isolated and mapped over a 10-year period. We begin at an early step of identifying what research questions to prioritize, we then plot PPIE activities for one of these research priorities, place of care, which evolved into BRIGHTLIGHT. We document steps along the way to evidence the impact of this involvement. Young people can make a valuable contribution to healthcare research given adequate support from the research team. Although some challenges exist, we propose that the benefits to young people, researchers and the study considerably outweigh these challenges and PPIE with young people should be integrated in all similar research studies.

Citing Articles

Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.

Cooper A, Nguyen L, Irelewuyi O, Miller S Children (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39457231 PMC: 11506337. DOI: 10.3390/children11101266.


Qualitative Study Examining Attendance for Secondary School Pupils With Long-Term Physical Health Conditions.

Hopwood V, Pini S, Spencer B, Kitchen C Contin Educ. 2024; 5(1):76-89.

PMID: 38774601 PMC: 11104356. DOI: 10.5334/cie.111.


Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.

Weiler-Wichtl L, Schneider C, Gsell H, Maletzky A, Kienesberger A, Rohl C Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(5):e2071.

PMID: 38767531 PMC: 11104286. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2071.


The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.

Spencer B, Hugh-Jones S, Cottrell D, Pini S Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):91.

PMID: 37828630 PMC: 10568929. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.


Reporting involvement activities with children and young people in paediatric research: a framework analysis.

Preston J, Biglino G, Harbottle V, Dalrymple E, Stalford H, Beresford M Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):61.

PMID: 37525218 PMC: 10388467. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00477-8.


References
1.
Whelan J . Where should teenagers with cancer be treated?. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39(18):2573-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.014. View

2.
Sedlis S, Ramanathan K, Morrison D, Sethi G, Sacks J, Henderson W . Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass grafting for patients with low left ventricular ejection fractions, unstable angina pectoris, and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass (the AWESOME Randomized Trial and.... Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94(1):118-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.041. View

3.
Ferrari A, Montello M, Budd T, Bleyer A . The challenges of clinical trials for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 50(5 Suppl):1101-4. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21459. View

4.
Birch J, Pang D, Alston R, Rowan S, Geraci M, Moran A . Survival from cancer in teenagers and young adults in England, 1979-2003. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99(5):830-5. PMC: 2528159. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604460. View

5.
Bengtsson-Tops A, Svensson B . Mental health users' experiences of being interviewed by another user in a research project. A qualitative study. J Ment Health. 2010; 19(3):237-42. DOI: 10.3109/09638230903531084. View