» Articles » PMID: 30607077

Effect of Conventional and Microwave Tissue Processing Technique on DNA Integrity: A Comparative Molecular Analysis

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Jan 5
PMID 30607077
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Methods of diagnostic molecular biology are routinely applied on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues processed via conventional method. Recently, there has been a growing interest to use microwave technology in histopathology laboratories to overcome the deficiencies of the conventional processing method. Thefore, this study was aimed to compare and analyze the quality and quantity of DNA obtained from tissues processed by conventional and microwave tissue processing techniques and to further ascertain the applicability of the latter for PCR (polymerase chain reaction based research).

Methods: Thirty fresh tissues of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) were included, and each sample was cut into two equivalent halves. One tissue half was processed by conventional manual method whereas the other half was processed using a domestic microwave oven. DNA was obtained from all the tissues which were then subjected to Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to evaluate GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) gene expression.

Results: The results revealed better DNA yield from microwave processed tissue while the quality of the DNA was alike from both the techniques.

Conclusion: On the basis of the results obtained, it can be concluded that DNA produced by microwave processed tissues was similar to that obtained by conventional processing technique in terms of quantity and quality. Thus, microwave processed tissue samples can be successfully used for further molecular studies and researches.

Citing Articles

Screening of P-35S, P-FMV, and T-NOS genetic elements in microwave-treated genetically modified cereal flours.

Hancerliogullari B, Yilmaz R Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50(6):4813-4822.

PMID: 37031325 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08408-2.

References
1.
Sato Y, Sugie R, Tsuchiya B, Kameya T, Natori M, Mukai K . Comparison of the DNA extraction methods for polymerase chain reaction amplification from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2002; 10(4):265-71. DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200112000-00009. View

2.
Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S . Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161(6):1961-71. PMC: 1850907. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64472-0. View

3.
Leong A . Microwaves and turnaround times in histoprocessing: is this a new era in histotechnology?. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004; 121(4):460-2. DOI: 10.1309/plq523dennh8r00q. View

4.
Emerson L, Tripp S, Baird B, Layfield L, Rohr L . A comparison of immunohistochemical stain quality in conventional and rapid microwave processed tissues. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006; 125(2):176-83. DOI: 10.1309/GN6Q-CBML-LEAT-LK2M. View

5.
Iesurum A, Balbi T, Vasapollo D, Cicognani A, Ghimenton C . Microwave processing and ethanol-based fixation in forensic pathology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006; 27(2):178-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.paf.0000221050.64572.01. View