» Articles » PMID: 30604188

Effect of Carvedilol on Heart Rate Response to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Up to the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients with Subacute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Journal Heart Vessels
Date 2019 Jan 4
PMID 30604188
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resting heart rate (HR) plus 20 or 30 beats per minute (bpm), i.e., a simplified substitute for HR at the anaerobic threshold (AT), is used as a tool for exercise prescription without cardiopulmonary exercise testing data. While resting HR plus 20 bpm is recommended for patients undergoing beta-blocker therapy, the effects of specific beta blockers on HR response to exercise up to the AT (ΔAT HR) in patients with subacute myocardial infarction (MI) are unclear. This study examined whether carvedilol treatment affects ΔAT HR in subacute MI patients. MI patients were divided into two age- and sex-matched groups [carvedilol (+), n = 66; carvedilol (-), n = 66]. All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 1 month after MI onset. ΔAT HR was calculated by subtracting resting HR from HR at AT. ΔAT HR did not differ significantly between the carvedilol (+) and carvedilol (-) groups (35.64 ± 9.65 vs. 34.67 ± 11.68, P = 0.604). Multiple regression analysis revealed that old age and heart failure after MI were significant predictors of lower ΔAT HR (P = 0.039 and P = 0.013, respectively), but not carvedilol treatment. Our results indicate that carvedilol treatment does not affect ΔAT HR in subacute MI patients. Therefore, exercise prescription based on HR plus 30 bpm may be feasible in this patient population, regardless of carvedilol use, without gas-exchange analysis data.

Citing Articles

Agreement between heart rate at first ventilatory threshold on treadmill and at 6-min walk test in coronary artery disease patients on β-blockers treatment.

Calegari L, Moreira I, Falkowski A, Reolao J, Karsten M, Fernando Deresz L J Exerc Rehabil. 2021; 17(5):362-368.

PMID: 34805026 PMC: 8566104. DOI: 10.12965/jer.2142488.244.


Effects of αβ-Blocker Versus β1-Blocker Treatment on Heart Rate Response During Incremental Cardiopulmonary Exercise in Japanese Male Patients with Subacute Myocardial Infarction.

Nemoto S, Kasahara Y, Izawa K, Watanabe S, Yoshizawa K, Takeichi N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(16).

PMID: 31398919 PMC: 6720421. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162838.

References
1.
Dargie H . Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357(9266):1385-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04560-8. View

2.
Strzelczyk T, Quigg R, Pfeifer P, Parker M, Greenland P . Accuracy of estimating exercise prescription intensity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001; 21(3):158-63. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200105000-00007. View

3.
Taylor R, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K . Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004; 116(10):682-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009. View

4.
Kasahara Y, Izawa K, Omiya K, Osada N, Watanabe S, Saitoh M . Influence of autonomic nervous dysfunction characterizing effect of diabetes mellitus on heart rate response and exercise capacity in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation for acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2006; 70(8):1017-25. DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.1017. View

5.
Tabet J, Meurin P, Ben Driss A, Thabut G, Weber H, Renaud N . Determination of exercise training heart rate in patients on beta-blockers after myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006; 13(4):538-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000209813.05573.4d. View