» Articles » PMID: 30601119

Chronology of Motor-mediated Microtubule Streaming

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Jan 3
PMID 30601119
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We introduce a filament-based simulation model for coarse-grained, effective motor-mediated interaction between microtubule pairs to study the time-scales that compose cytoplasmic streaming. We characterise microtubule dynamics in two-dimensional systems by chronologically arranging five distinct processes of varying duration that make up streaming, from microtubule pairs to collective dynamics. The structures found were polarity sorted due to the propulsion of antialigned microtubules. This also gave rise to the formation of large polar-aligned domains, and streaming at the domain boundaries. Correlation functions, mean squared displacements, and velocity distributions reveal a cascade of processes ultimately leading to microtubule streaming and advection, spanning multiple microtubule lengths. The characteristic times for the processes extend over three orders of magnitude from fast single-microtubule processes to slow collective processes. Our approach can be used to directly test the importance of molecular components, such as motors and crosslinking proteins between microtubules, on the collective dynamics at cellular scale.

Citing Articles

Growth rate-dependent flexural rigidity of microtubules influences pattern formation in collective motion.

Zhou H, Isozaki N, Fujimoto K, Yokokawa R J Nanobiotechnology. 2021; 19(1):218.

PMID: 34281555 PMC: 8287809. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00960-y.


Effects of spatial dimensionality and steric interactions on microtubule-motor self-organization.

Rickman J, Nedelec F, Surrey T Phys Biol. 2019; 16(4):046004.

PMID: 31013252 PMC: 7655122. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/ab0fb1.

References
1.
Kerssemakers J, Howard J, Hess H, Diez S . The distance that kinesin-1 holds its cargo from the microtubule surface measured by fluorescence interference contrast microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(43):15812-7. PMC: 1595308. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510400103. View

2.
Serbus L, Cha B, Theurkauf W, Saxton W . Dynein and the actin cytoskeleton control kinesin-driven cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes. Development. 2005; 132(16):3743-52. PMC: 1534125. DOI: 10.1242/dev.01956. View

3.
Quinlan M . Cytoplasmic Streaming in the Drosophila Oocyte. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 32:173-195. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125416. View

4.
Belmonte J, Leptin M, Nedelec F . A theory that predicts behaviors of disordered cytoskeletal networks. Mol Syst Biol. 2017; 13(9):941. PMC: 5615920. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20177796. View

5.
Howard J, Hudspeth A, Vale R . Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989; 342(6246):154-8. DOI: 10.1038/342154a0. View