» Articles » PMID: 30598698

Combined Ensiling and Hydrothermal Processing As Efficient Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for 2G Bioethanol Production

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Jan 2
PMID 30598698
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ensiling cannot be utilized as a stand-alone pretreatment for sugar-based biorefinery processes but, in combination with hydrothermal processing, it can enhance pretreatment while ensuring a stable long-term storage option for abundant but moist biomass. The effectiveness of combining ensiling with hydrothermal pretreatment depends on biomass nature, pretreatment, and silage conditions.

Results: In the present study, the efficiency of the combined pretreatment was assessed by enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation, and it was demonstrated that ensiling of sugarcane bagasse produces organic acids that can partly degrade biomass structure when in combination with hydrothermal treatment, with the consequent improvement of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and of the overall 2G bioethanol process efficiency. The optimal pretreatment conditions found in this study were those using ensiling and/or hydrothermal pretreatment at 190 °C for 10 min as this yielded the highest overall glucose recovery yield and ethanol yield from the raw material (0.28-0.30 g/g and 0.14 g/g, respectively).

Conclusion: Ensiling prior to hydrothermal pretreatment offers a controlled solution for wet storage and long-term preservation for sugarcane bagasse, thus avoiding the need for drying. This preservation method combined with long-term storage practice can be an attractive option for integrated 1G/2G bioethanol plants, as it does not require large capital investments or energy inputs and leads to comparable or higher overall sugar recovery and ethanol yields.

Citing Articles

Subcritical Water Pretreatment for the Efficient Valorization of Sorghum Distillery Residue for the Biorefinery Platform.

Singh A, Chen C, Patel A, Dong C, Singhania R Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36671609 PMC: 9854917. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010038.


Cost-effective production of biocatalysts using inexpensive plant biomass: a review.

Sakhuja D, Ghai H, Rathour R, Kumar P, Bhatt A, Bhatia R 3 Biotech. 2021; 11(6):280.

PMID: 34094799 PMC: 8137741. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-021-02847-z.


Review on Bioenergy Storage Systems for Preserving and Improving Feedstock Value.

Wendt L, Zhao H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:370.

PMID: 32411689 PMC: 7198811. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00370.


What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview.

Figueroa-Rodriguez K, Hernandez-Rosas F, Figueroa-Sandoval B, Velasco-Velasco J, Aguilar Rivera N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(18).

PMID: 31509963 PMC: 6765814. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183326.

References
1.
Johnson H, Merry R, Davies D, Kell D, Theodorou M, Griffith G . Vacuum packing: a model system for laboratory-scale silage fermentations. J Appl Microbiol. 2004; 98(1):106-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02444.x. View

2.
Yang H, Wang X, Liu J, Gao L, Ishii M, Igarashi Y . Effects of water-soluble carbohydrate content on silage fermentation of wheat straw. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006; 101(3):232-7. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.101.232. View

3.
Xu J, Thomsen M, Thomsen A . Feasibility of hydrothermal pretreatment on maize silage for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009; 162(1):33-42. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-009-8706-9. View

4.
Cardona C, Quintero J, Paz I . Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: Status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 101(13):4754-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.097. View

5.
Silva V, Arruda P, Felipe M, Goncalves A, Rocha G . Fermentation of cellulosic hydrolysates obtained by enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by hydrothermal processing. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 38(7):809-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0815-5. View