Using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale to Grade the Intensity of a Functional Training Program of the Affected Upper Limb After a Stroke: a Feasibility Study

Overview

Journal Clin Interv Aging

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2018 Dec 28

PMID 30587949

Citations 9

Authors

Marie-Helene Milot

Guillaume Leonard

Helene Corriveau

Johanne Desrosiers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity of a training program is a critical variable in treatment gains poststroke, but there are no guidelines to adequately dose the intensity of functional training (FT); the recommended type of training to promote poststroke recovery. Such guidelines are made available for strength training (ST) using the 1 repetition maximum (1RM), which has been linked to individuals' self-rated level of exertion using the Borg rating of perceived exertion (BRPE) scale. The BRPE could be a valuable tool for clinicians to dose FT intensity after a stroke, but this remains to be tested. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of the BRPE at grading FT intensity of the affected upper limb in older adults with a chronic stroke and secondarily to explore the clinical changes between FT and ST when the intensity is regulated with BRPE.

Patients And Methods: Twelve participants were randomized into a FT or ST group and trained their affected upper limb (3 times/week for 4 weeks) with the intensity standardized with BRPE. Feasibility was assessed by adherence, occurrence of adverse events, and comparison of BRPE ratings between groups. Clinical changes were defined as improvements on the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA) and Wolf motor function test (WMFT).

Results: All participants adhered to FT/ST without adverse effects, and comparable BRPE ratings were noted between groups throughout the training (0.42). Both groups showed significant gains at the FMA (ST: 5±4 points/FT: 6±4 points; =0.04) and WMFT (ST: 0.4±0.3 points/FT: 0.6±0.4 points; =0.05), which were comparable between groups (0.47).

Conclusion: The results suggest that it is feasible to use the BRPE scale to adjust FT intensity. Gains in motor function in both groups suggest that undergoing therapy, regardless of its type, might be a sufficient stimulus to produce gains when intensity is adequately adjusted. Further studies are needed to validate the current observations.

Citing Articles

Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study.

Goikoetxea-Sotelo G, van Hedel H Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1405304.

PMID: 39507588 PMC: 11538011. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1405304.

Combined exercise training decreases blood pressure in OLDER women with polymorphism providing changes in differentially methylated regions (DMRs).

da Silva Rodrigues G, Noronha N, de Lima J, Harumi Yonehara Noma I, da Silva Sobrinho A, Maria Diani L Epigenetics. 2024; 19(1):2375030.

PMID: 38967279 PMC: 11229753. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2375030.

Effects of the different intensities of task-oriented training on the upper extremity motor function and self-care ability of stroke survivors: study protocol for a multiarm parallel-group randomised controlled trial in a tertiary hospital in China.

Liu S, Zhang K, Li X, Li C, Peng M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e074106.

PMID: 38070930 PMC: 10729097. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074106.

Aerobic physical exercise versus dual-task cognitive walking in cognitive rehabilitation of people with stroke: a randomized clinical trial.

Maeneja R, Silva C, Ferreira I, Abreu A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1258262.

PMID: 37901076 PMC: 10611528. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258262.

The relevance of body composition assessment for the rating of perceived exertion in trained and untrained women and men.

Lichti J, Maggioni M, Balcerek B, Becker P, Labes R, Gunga H Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1188802.

PMID: 37593237 PMC: 10431604. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1188802.

References

Boissy P, Bourbonnais D, Carlotti M, Gravel D, Arsenault B . Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function. Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13(4):354-62. DOI: 10.1191/026921599676433080. View

Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7(1):13-31. View

Morris D, Uswatte G, Crago J, Cook 3rd E, Taub E . The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(6):750-5. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183. View

Mercier C, Bourbonnais D . Relative shoulder flexor and handgrip strength is related to upper limb function after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18(2):215-21. DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr724oa. View

Winstein C, Rose D, Tan S, Lewthwaite R, Chui H, Azen S . A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(4):620-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.027. View

Patten C, Lexell J, Brown H . Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004; 41(3A):293-312. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.03.0293. View

Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I, Di Bella P, Johnson G . Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa. View

Wolf S, Thompson P, Morris D, Rose D, Winstein C, Taub E . The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005; 19(3):194-205. DOI: 10.1177/1545968305276663. View

Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson P . The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006; 67(7):1189-94. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2. View

10.

Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D . Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296(17):2095-104. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095. View

11.

Lagally K, Amorose A . The validity of using prior ratings of perceive exertion to regulate resistance exercise intensity. Percept Mot Skills. 2007; 104(2):534-42. DOI: 10.2466/pms.104.2.534-542. View

12.

Chang J, Tung W, Wu W, Huang M, Su F . Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(10):1332-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016. View

13.

Dobkin B . Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008; 4(2):76-85. PMC: 4099052. DOI: 10.1038/ncpneuro0709. View

14.

Park S, Wolf S, Blanton S, Winstein C, Nichols-Larsen D . The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22(5):486-93. PMC: 3754439. DOI: 10.1177/1545968308316906. View

15.

Lin K, Hsieh Y, Wu C, Chen C, Jang Y, Liu J . Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(5):429-34. DOI: 10.1177/1545968308331144. View

16.

Hubbard I, Parsons M, Neilson C, Carey L . Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009; 16(3-4):175-89. DOI: 10.1002/oti.275. View

17.

Wallace A, Talelli P, Dileone M, Oliver R, Ward N, Cloud G . Standardizing the intensity of upper limb treatment in rehabilitation medicine. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24(5):471-8. PMC: 2994273. DOI: 10.1177/0269215509358944. View

18.

Nijland R, Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G . A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42(7):694-6. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0560. View

19.

Vermeulen J, Neyens J, van Rossum E, Spreeuwenberg M, de Witte L . Predicting ADL disability in community-dwelling elderly people using physical frailty indicators: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2011; 11:33. PMC: 3142492. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-33. View

20.

Page S, Fulk G, Boyne P . Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012; 92(6):791-8. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20110009. View