» Articles » PMID: 30586724

Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2018 Dec 28
PMID 30586724
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: New-generation drug-eluting stents offer the potential for enhanced late outcomes in comparison with early generation drug-eluting stents. However, assessment of extended long-term outcomes for these devices is lacking, especially regarding the comparison between new-generation drug-eluting stents with biodegradable or permanent polymers. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES; Yukon Choice PC) versus permanent polymer-based everolimus-eluting stents (PP-EES; Xience) versus early generation permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (PP-SES; Cypher) at 10-year follow-up.

Methods: Overall, 2603 patients were randomized to treatment with BP-SES (n=1299), PP-EES (n=652), or PP-SES (n=652). The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac event, the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. The main secondary end point of interest was definite/probable stent thrombosis. Follow-up at 10 years was available in 83% of the study patients.

Results: The 10-year incidence of major adverse cardiac event (BP-SES 47.7% versus PP-EES 46.0% versus PP-SES 54.9%, P=0.003) and mortality (BP-SES 31.8% versus PP-EES 30.3% versus PP-SES 37.2%, P=0.02) was different among the groups. Definite/probable stent thrombosis was not significantly different among the groups (BP-SES 1.8% versus PP-EES 2.5% versus PP-SES 3.7%, P=0.09). Definite stent thrombosis was significantly different among the groups (BP-SES 1.1% versus PP-EES 0.8% versus PP-SES 2.4%, P=0.03). There were no significant differences between BP-SES and PP-EES.

Conclusions: In this unique long-term outcome analysis, BP-SES and PP-EES showed comparable clinical outcomes out to 10 years. PP-SES had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events and definite stent thrombosis.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00598676.

Citing Articles

Sex and age-specific 10-year mortality after coronary stenting: an analysis of two randomized trials.

Pinxterhuis T, Ploumen E, Doggen C, van Vliet D, Kok M, Zocca P Eur Heart J Open. 2025; 5(1):oeaf006.

PMID: 39959922 PMC: 11829202. DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf006.


One-Year Prognosis for Patients Diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome Compared to Those with Chronic Coronary Syndrome Following Complex Coronary Procedures.

Wozniak P, Stepien K, Wanha W, Smukowska-Gorynia A, Araszkiewicz A, Lesiak M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941402 PMC: 11818052. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030730.


Sex-related outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis.

Kuna C, Bradaric C, Schroeter M, Presch A, Voll F, Kufner S Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025; 40(2):316-326.

PMID: 39899260 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01092-y.


Impaired Kidney Function and 10-Year Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Interaction with Age, Sex, Diabetic Status and Clinical Presentation.

Ndrepepa G, Kufner S, Cassese S, Joner M, Sager H, Xhepa E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597977 PMC: 11594875. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226833.


Ten-year clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents implantation according to clinical presentation-Insights from the DECADE cooperation.

Starnecker F, Coughlan J, Jensen L, Bar S, Kufner S, Brugaletta S Eur J Clin Invest. 2024; 55(1):e14323.

PMID: 39351821 PMC: 11628648. DOI: 10.1111/eci.14323.