» Articles » PMID: 30586421

Using Climate Envelope Models to Identify Potential Ecological Trajectories on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Dec 27
PMID 30586421
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Managers need information about the vulnerability of historical plant communities, and their potential future conditions, to respond appropriately to landscape change driven by global climate change. We model the climate envelopes of plant communities on the Kenai Peninsula in Southcentral Alaska and forecast to 2020, 2050, and 2080. We assess 6 model outputs representing downscaled climate data from 3 global climate model outputs and 2 representative concentration pathways. We use two lines of evidence, model convergence and empirically measured rates of change, to identify the following plausible ecological trajectories for the peninsula: (1.) alpine tundra and sub-alpine shrub decrease, (2.) perennial snow and ice decrease, (3.) forests remain on the Kenai Lowlands, (4.) the contiguous white-Lutz-Sitka spruce complex declines, and (5.) mixed conifer afforestation occurs along the Gulf of Alaska coast. We suggest that converging models in the context of other lines of evidence is a viable approach to increase certainty for adaptation planning. Extremely dynamic areas with multiple outcomes (i.e., disagreement) among models represent ecological risk, but may also represent opportunities for facilitated adaptation and other managerial approaches to help tip the balance one way or another. By reducing uncertainty, this eclectic approach can be used to inform expectations about the future.

References
1.
Stuart Chapin 3rd F, Carpenter S, Kofinas G, Folke C, Abel N, Clark W . Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 25(4):241-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008. View

2.
Hamann A, Wang T . Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology. 2006; 87(11):2773-86. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2773:peocco]2.0.co;2. View

3.
Dawson T, Jackson S, House J, Prentice I, Mace G . Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science. 2011; 332(6025):53-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1200303. View

4.
Dial R, Smeltz T, Sullivan P, Rinas C, Timm K, Geck J . Shrubline but not treeline advance matches climate velocity in montane ecosystems of south-central Alaska. Glob Chang Biol. 2016; 22(5):1841-56. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13207. View

5.
Rowland E, Davison J, Graumlich L . Approaches to evaluating climate change impacts on species: a guide to initiating the adaptation planning process. Environ Manage. 2011; 47(3):322-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9608-x. View