» Articles » PMID: 30577615

DNA Damage and Repair in Human Reproductive Cells

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 Dec 23
PMID 30577615
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fundamental underlying paradigm of sexual reproduction is the production of male and female gametes of sufficient genetic difference and quality that, following syngamy, they result in embryos with genomic potential to allow for future adaptive change and the ability to respond to selective pressure. The fusion of dissimilar gametes resulting in the formation of a normal and viable embryo is known as anisogamy, and is concomitant with precise structural, physiological, and molecular control of gamete function for species survival. However, along the reproductive life cycle of all organisms, both male and female gametes can be exposed to an array of "stressors" that may adversely affect the composition and biological integrity of their proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, that may consequently compromise their capacity to produce normal embryos. The aim of this review is to highlight gamete genome organization, differences in the chronology of gamete production between the male and female, the inherent DNA protective mechanisms in these reproductive cells, the aetiology of DNA damage in germ cells, and the remarkable DNA repair mechanisms, pre- and post-syngamy, that function to maintain genome integrity.

Citing Articles

Genotoxicity study of L. extract.

Costa A, Gasparotto Jr A, Pereira C, Lourenco E, Garcia A, Joaquim H Toxicol Rep. 2025; 14():101864.

PMID: 39816045 PMC: 11733056. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101864.


Impact of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting on Embryonic Euploidy in Infertile Patients with Sperm DNA Damage: A Retrospective Study.

Lara-Cerrillo S, Raquel Jimenez Macedo A, Hortal O, Rosado Iglesias C, Lacruz Ruiz T, Carrera J Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(4):417-423.

PMID: 39564835 PMC: 11589983. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2024.2007775.1499.


Mutational signature analyses in multi-child families reveal sources of age-related increases in human germline mutations.

Shojaeisaadi H, Schoenrock A, Meier M, Williams A, Norris J, Palmer N Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1451.

PMID: 39506086 PMC: 11541588. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07140-2.


Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Next-Generation Sequencing in Sperm Evaluation: Implications for Preimplantation Genetic Testing and Male Infertility.

Moustakli E, Gkountis A, Dafopoulos S, Zikopoulos A, Sotiriou S, Zachariou A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39457078 PMC: 11508275. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011296.


The effect of male factors on embryo morphokinetics: a retrospective analysis of 2726 blastocysts.

Pellegrini L, Gatti S, Navarro N, Hervas I, Marcos M, Viviana V J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3467-3475.

PMID: 39370476 PMC: 11707112. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03275-7.


References
1.
Wolczynski S, Jozwik M, Szamatowicz M . Oxidative stress markers in preovulatory follicular fluid in humans. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999; 5(5):409-13. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/5.5.409. View

2.
Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, St John J . Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res. 1999; 251(2):350-5. DOI: 10.1006/excr.1999.4586. View

3.
Ahmadi A, Ng S . Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1999; 284(6):696-704. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19991101)284:6<696::aid-jez11>3.0.co;2-e. View

4.
Dumoulin J, Coonen E, Bras M, van Wissen L, Derhaag J, Geraedts J . Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(2):402-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.402. View

5.
Essers J, van Steeg H, de Wit J, Swagemakers S, Vermeij M, Hoeijmakers J . Homologous and non-homologous recombination differentially affect DNA damage repair in mice. EMBO J. 2000; 19(7):1703-10. PMC: 310238. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1703. View