» Articles » PMID: 30570504

Matching and Homogenizing Convolution Kernels for Quantitative Studies in Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal Invest Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Dec 21
PMID 30570504
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The sharpness of the kernels used for image reconstruction in computed tomography affects the values of the quantitative image features. We sought to identify the kernels that produce similar feature values to enable a more effective comparison of images produced using scanners from different manufactures. We also investigated a new image filter designed to change the kernel-related component of the frequency spectrum of a postreconstruction image from that of the initial kernel to that of a preferred kernel. A radiomics texture phantom was imaged using scanners from GE, Philips, Siemens, and Toshiba. Images were reconstructed multiple times, varying the kernel from smooth to sharp. The phantom comprised 10 cartridges of various textures. A semiautomated method was used to produce 8 × 2 × 2 cm regions of interest for each cartridge and for all scans. For each region of interest, 38 radiomics features from the categories intensity direct (n = 12), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (n = 21), and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix (n = 5) were extracted. We then calculated the fractional differences of the features from those of the baseline kernel (GE Standard). To gauge the importance of the differences, we scaled them by the coefficient of variation of the same feature from a cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The noise power spectra for each kernel were estimated from the phantom's solid acrylic cartridge, and kernel-homogenization filters were developed from these estimates. The Philips C, Siemens B30f, and Toshiba FC24 kernels produced feature values most similar to GE Standard. The kernel homogenization filters reduced the median differences from baseline to less than 1 coefficient of variation in the patient population for all of the GE, Philips, and Siemens kernels except for GE Edge and Toshiba kernels. For prospective computed tomographic radiomics studies, the scanning protocol should specify kernels that have been shown to produce similar feature values. For retrospective studies, kernel homogenization filters can be designed and applied to reduce the kernel-related differences in the feature values.

Citing Articles

Establishing the effect of computed tomography reconstruction kernels on the measure of bone mineral density in opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Matheson B, Boyd S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5449.

PMID: 39953113 PMC: 11828980. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88551-x.


Can CT Image Reconstruction Parameters Impact the Predictive Value of Radiomics Features in Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?.

Tixier F, Lopez-Ramirez F, Blanco A, Yasrab M, Javed A, Chu L Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851354 PMC: 11763079. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010080.


Differential Radiomics-Based Signature Predicts Lung Cancer Risk Accounting for Imaging Parameters in NLST Cohort.

Ebrahimpour L, Despres P, Manem V Cancer Med. 2024; 13(20):e70359.

PMID: 39463128 PMC: 11513548. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70359.


Inter-vendor harmonization of CT reconstruction kernels using unpaired image translation.

Krishnan A, Xu K, Li T, Gao C, Remedios L, Kanakaraj P Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2024; 12926.

PMID: 39268356 PMC: 11392419. DOI: 10.1117/12.3006608.


Generative Adversarial Networks With Radiomics Supervision for Lung Lesion Generation.

Li J, Pan S, Zhang X, Lin C, Stayman J, Gang G IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 72(1):286-296.

PMID: 39208053 PMC: 11868448. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3451409.


References
1.
Mackin D, Ger R, Dodge C, Fave X, Chi P, Zhang L . Effect of tube current on computed tomography radiomic features. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):2354. PMC: 5799381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20713-6. View

2.
Mackin D, Fave X, Zhang L, Yang J, Kyle Jones A, Ng C . Harmonizing the pixel size in retrospective computed tomography radiomics studies. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0178524. PMC: 5608195. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178524. View

3.
Yasaka K, Akai H, Mackin D, Court L, Moros E, Ohtomo K . Precision of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis using image filtering: A phantom study for scanner variability. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(21):e6993. PMC: 5457888. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006993. View

4.
Solomon J, Christianson O, Samei E . Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Med Phys. 2012; 39(10):6048-55. DOI: 10.1118/1.4752209. View

5.
Runge V, Marquez H, Andreisek G, Valavanis A, Alkadhi H . Recent technological advances in computed tomography and the clinical impact therein. Invest Radiol. 2014; 50(2):119-27. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000125. View