» Articles » PMID: 30565215

Three Key Factors Influencing the Bacterial Contamination of Dental Unit Waterlines: a 6-year Survey from 2012 to 2017

Overview
Journal Int Dent J
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Dec 20
PMID 30565215
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The contaminated output water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is a potential risk to both patients and dental personnel who are frequently exposed to this water or aerosols.

Aim: The purpose was to evaluate the contamination level and prevalence of bacteria in the output water of DUWLs, and to identify key factors to provide technical support for formulating relevant policies.

Methods: We developed a special sampling connector designed for collecting dental handpiece output water and a measurement device to assess retraction of a dental chair unit (DCU). Output water from dental handpieces and air/water syringes were collected as representative of DUWLs. Water samples were tested with reference to China's national standard.

Findings: From 2012 to 2017, 318 DCUs were randomly selected from 64 hospitals in Tianjin, China. Of these DCUs, 78.93% had no disinfection to prevent DUWL contamination. Three-hundred and forty-three (56.14%) samples complied with the guidelines on DUWL output water. The highest concentration of bacteria was 1.8 × 10  colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL. The three key factors of influence were as follows: daily or weekly disinfection of DUWLs; water supply source being hospital self-made purified water or purchased purified bottled water; and DCU with a valid anti-retraction valve. Potential infectious agents, including Bacillus cereus, Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were isolated.

Conclusion: There was a high rate of contamination in DUWLs. This highlights the need to develop national standards. There is a need to disinfect the DUWLs periodically and use a cleaner source of water; more attention should be paid to the efficacy of DCU anti-retraction valves.

Citing Articles

Periodic detection and disinfection maintenance of dental unit waterlines in dental simulation head model laboratories.

Li B, Hu Y, Wang Y, Zhang C, Wang Z, Peng X Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5234.

PMID: 39939661 PMC: 11821815. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89010-3.


In vitro evaluation of hypochlorous acid-silver nanoparticle waterline disinfectant for dental unit waterline disinfection.

Yin T, Li Q, Sun H, Zheng J, Wang Y, Luo Y BMC Chem. 2025; 19(1):25.

PMID: 39871300 PMC: 11773736. DOI: 10.1186/s13065-025-01382-9.


Mycobiology of Dental Unit Water: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Sobon N, Fakhruddin K, Samaranayake L, Remmani N, Mohammed M, Porntaveetus T Int Dent J. 2024; 75(1):86-99.

PMID: 39701921 PMC: 11806301. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.10.020.


Bacterial contamination of new dental unit waterlines and efficacy of shock disinfection.

Baudet A, Lizon J, Lozniewski A, Florentin A, Mortier E BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):529.

PMID: 39695925 PMC: 11657442. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03678-7.


The effect of different types of water sources on dental unit waterline contamination: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Shuai T, Shao T, Yi L, Han S, Jimenez-Herrera M, Wang Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e35745.

PMID: 39220891 PMC: 11365326. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35745.


References
1.
Sacchetti R, De Luca G, Zanetti F . Influence of material and tube size on DUWLs contamination in a pilot plant. New Microbiol. 2007; 30(1):29-34. View

2.
Leoni E, Dallolio L, Stagni F, Sanna T, DAlessandro G, Piana G . Impact of a risk management plan on Legionella contamination of dental unit water. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(3):2344-58. PMC: 4377905. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120302344. View

3.
Schonning C, Jernberg C, Klingenberg D, Andersson S, Paajarvi A, Alm E . Legionellosis acquired through a dental unit: a case study. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 96(1):89-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.01.009. View

4.
Al-Hiyasat A, Maayeh S, Hindiyeh M, Khader Y . The presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the dental unit waterline systems of teaching clinics. Int J Dent Hyg. 2007; 5(1):36-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00221.x. View

5.
Arvand M, Hack A . Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in dental practices in Hesse, Germany: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2013; 3(1):49-52. PMC: 3832077. DOI: 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.1.7. View