» Articles » PMID: 30563814

Attitudes and Preferences Toward a Hypothetical Trial of an Internet-Administered Psychological Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Web-Based Survey

Overview
Date 2018 Dec 20
PMID 30563814
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are often challenged with issues of recruitment and retention. Little is known concerning general attitudes and preferences toward trial design and willingness to participate among parents of children treated for cancer. Furthermore, willingness to participate in internet-administered psychological interventions remains unexplored. In this study, we examined attitudes and preferences of the population regarding study procedures for a hypothetical trial of an internet-administered psychological intervention. In addition, differences in the response rate between modes of study invitation and willingness to engage in internet-administered interventions were examined.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine attitudes and preferences toward participating in an internet-administrated psychological intervention. The secondary objective was to examine the response rates and help-seeking behavior among parents of children treated for cancer.

Methods: A cross-sectional, Web-based survey was conducted with parents of children who had completed cancer treatment. This Web-based survey examined self-reported emotional distress, prior help-seeking and receipt of psychological support, past research participation, attitudes toward research, preferences concerning recruitment procedures, and attitudes toward different types of trial design.

Results: Of all the parents invited, 32.0% (112/350) completed the survey, with no difference in response rate between modes of study invitation (χ=0.6, P=.45). The majority (80/112, 71.4%) of parents responded that they had experienced past emotional distress. Responses indicated high (56/112, 50.0%) or somewhat high trust in research (51/112, 45.5%), and the majority of parents would accept, or maybe accept, internet-administered psychological support if offered (83/112, 74.1%). In addition, responses showed a preference for postal study invitation letters (86/112, 76.8%), sent by a researcher (84/112, 75.0%) with additional study information provided on the Web via text (81/112, 72.3%) and video (66/112, 58.9%). Overall, parents responded that trials utilizing a waiting list control, active alternative treatment control, or a patient-preference design were acceptable.

Conclusions: Parents of children treated for cancer appear willing to participate in trials examining internet-administered psychological support. Findings of this study will inform the design of a feasibility trial examining internet-administered psychological support for the population.

Citing Articles

Engagement With an Internet-Administered, Guided, Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Analysis of Log-Data From the ENGAGE Feasibility Trial.

Reuther C, von Essen L, Mustafa M, Saarijarvi M, Woodford J JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e67171.

PMID: 39874575 PMC: 11815309. DOI: 10.2196/67171.


E-therapists' views on the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: A qualitative study.

Reuther C, Lundgren J, Gottvall M, Ljungberg J, Woodford J, von Essen L Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241260513.

PMID: 38846368 PMC: 11155313. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241260513.


Acceptability of Tele-mental Health Services Among Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abuyadek R, Hammouda E, Elrewany E, Elmalawany D, Ashmawy R, Zeina S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1143.

PMID: 38658881 PMC: 11040906. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18436-7.


Involving parents of children treated for cancer in Sweden as public contributors to inform the design and conduct of an evaluation of internet-administered self-help for parents of children treated for cancer: a protocol.

Woodford J, Reuther C, Ljungberg J, von Essen L Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):2.

PMID: 38167254 PMC: 10759441. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00532-4.


Internet-administered, low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy for parents of children treated for cancer: A feasibility trial (ENGAGE).

Thiblin E, Woodford J, Reuther C, Lundgren J, Lutvica N, von Essen L Cancer Med. 2022; 12(5):6225-6243.

PMID: 36404407 PMC: 10028033. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5377.


References
1.
Bruce M . A systematic and conceptual review of posttraumatic stress in childhood cancer survivors and their parents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006; 26(3):233-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.10.002. View

2.
Ford J, Howerton M, Lai G, Gary T, Bolen S, Gibbons M . Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2007; 112(2):228-42. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23157. View

3.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

4.
Sood A, Prasad K, Chhatwani L, Shinozaki E, Cha S, Loehrer L . Patients' attitudes and preferences about participation and recruitment strategies in clinical trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84(3):243-7. PMC: 2664601. DOI: 10.4065/84.3.243. View

5.
Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View