» Articles » PMID: 30560510

The Relationship Between Moral Climate of Sports and the Moral Behavior of Young Athletes: A Multilevel Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Youth Adolesc
Date 2018 Dec 19
PMID 30560510
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) moral behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the moral behavior of young athletes; one of these is the moral climate, that is, the socio-moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between moral climate and moral behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age < 18 years) was conducted. The results show that there is an overall significant association between these two variables (r= 0.40), indicating that a prosocial moral climate is related to less antisocial and more prosocial behavior, while an antisocial moral climate is associated with more antisocial and less prosocial behavior of young athletes. Two study characteristics significantly moderated this relationship: specifically, stronger associations were found in cross-sectional and in older studies. In addition, the strength of the association between moral climate and moral behavior was stronger for antisocial moral climate compared to prosocial moral climate. Finally, associations for team members were stronger than those of coaches or a broad moral club climate. Implications for further research and sports practice are discussed.

Citing Articles

Monkey see, monkey do? Exploring parent-athlete behaviours from youth athletes' perspective.

McCabe L, Tsiros M, Crozier A Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 5:1292812.

PMID: 38239890 PMC: 10795165. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1292812.


School climate and adolescents' prosocial behavior: the mediating role of perceived social support and resilience.

Luo Y, Ma T, Deng Y Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1095566.

PMID: 37484099 PMC: 10356984. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095566.


Defining sports moral character and clarifying its related concepts.

Liu C, Qu G, Gao R Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1101377.

PMID: 36873664 PMC: 9981655. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1101377.


Answering the call for values-based anti-doping education-An evidence-informed intervention for elite adolescent athletes in Germany and Austria.

Manges T, Seidel K, Walter N, Schuler T, Elbe A Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:859153.

PMID: 36213453 PMC: 9541105. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.859153.


Effect of mass sports activity on prosocial behavior: A sequential mediation model of flow trait and subjective wellbeing.

Duan X, Wang X, Li X, Li S, Zhong Y, Bu T Front Public Health. 2022; 10:960870.

PMID: 35979458 PMC: 9376381. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.960870.


References
1.
Spruit A, van der Put C, van Vugt E, Stams G . Predictors of Intervention Success in a Sports-Based Program for Adolescents at Risk of Juvenile Delinquency. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017; 62(6):1535-1555. PMC: 5904749. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X17698055. View

2.
Somerville L, Jones R, Casey B . A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain Cogn. 2009; 72(1):124-33. PMC: 2814936. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.003. View

3.
Gano-Overway L . Exploring the connections between caring and social behaviors in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013; 84(1):104-14. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2013.762322. View

4.
Rutten E, Stams G, Biesta G, Schuengel C, Dirks E, Hoeksma J . The Contribution of Organized Youth Sport to Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescent Athletes. J Youth Adolesc. 2016; 36(3):255-64. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9085-y. View

5.
Cho J, Knowles E . I'm like you and you're like me: social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 104(3):444-56. DOI: 10.1037/a0031017. View