» Articles » PMID: 30560440

Effect on Comfort of Administering Bubble-humidified or Dry Oxygen: the Oxyrea Non-inferiority Randomized Study

Abstract

Background: The clinical interest of using bubble humidification of oxygen remains controversial. This study was designed to further explore whether delivering dry oxygen instead of bubble-moistened oxygen had an impact on discomfort of ICU patients.

Methods: This randomized multicenter non-inferiority open trial included patients admitted in intensive care unit and receiving oxygen. Any patient receiving non-humidified oxygen (between 0 and 15 L/min) for less than 2 h could participate in the study. Randomization was stratified based on the flow rate at inclusion (less or more than 4 L/min). Discomfort was assessed 6-8 and 24 h after inclusion using a dedicated 15-item scale (quoted from 0 to 150).

Results: Three hundred and fifty-four ICU patients receiving non-humidified oxygen were randomized either in the humidified (HO) (n = 172), using bubble humidifiers, or in the non-humidified (NHO) (n = 182) arms. In modified intention-to-treat analysis at H6-H8, the 15-item score was 26.6 ± 19.4 and 29.8 ± 23.4 in the HO and NHO groups, respectively. The absolute difference between scores in both groups was 3.2 [90% CI 0.0; + 6.5] for a non-inferiority margin of 5.3, meaning that the non-inferiority analysis was not conclusive. This was also true for the subgroups of patients receiving either less or more than 4 L/min of oxygen. At H24, using NHO was not inferior compared to HO in the general population and in the subgroup of patients receiving 4 L/min or less of oxygen. However, for patients receiving more than 4 L/min, a post hoc superiority analysis suggested that patients receiving dry oxygen were less comfortable.

Conclusions: Oxygen therapy-related discomfort was low. Dry oxygen could not be demonstrated as non-inferior compared to bubble-moistened oxygen after 6-8 h of oxygen administration. At 24 h, dry oxygen was non-inferior compared to bubble-humidified oxygen for flows below 4 L/min.

Citing Articles

Epistaxis in Pregnant Women in the Covid-19 Era.

Shamkhi Abbood M, Shamkhee E, Abbas Hammadi S Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 36(6):669-674.

PMID: 39650079 PMC: 11624853. DOI: 10.22038/ijorl.2024.76230.3553.


To: Epistaxis as a complication of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in adults.

Nair A, Esquinas A Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022; 34(3):396-397.

PMID: 36351071 PMC: 9749101. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220047-pt.


Cold Bubble Humidification of Oxygen: Old habits die hard.

Dasgupta S, Ghosh S, Chandra A Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022; 22(3):309-313.

PMID: 36072067 PMC: 9423755. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.1.2022.002.


[Oxygen in the acute care of adults : Short version of the German S3 guideline].

Gottlieb J, Capetian P, Hamsen U, Janssens U, Karagiannidis C, Kluge S Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021; 117(1):4-15.

PMID: 34651197 PMC: 8516090. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-021-00884-3.


Epistaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Dellera V, Dosdegani R, Aluffi Valletti P, Garzaro M J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(8):300060520951040.

PMID: 32865072 PMC: 7459174. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520951040.

References
1.
Miyamoto K, Nishimura M . Nasal dryness discomfort in individuals receiving dry oxygen via nasal cannula. Respir Care. 2008; 53(4):503-4. View

2.
Fulmer J, Snider G . American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)--National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Conference on oxygen therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1984; 144(8):1645-55. View

3.
Novaes M, Knobel E, Bork A, Pavao O, Nogueira-Martins L, Ferraz M . Stressors in ICU: perception of the patient, relatives and health care team. Intensive Care Med. 2000; 25(12):1421-6. DOI: 10.1007/s001340051091. View

4.
Dery R, Pelletier J, Jacques A, CLAVET M, HOUDE J . Humidity in anaesthesiology. 3. Heat and moisture patterns in the respiratory tract during anaesthesia with the semi-closed system. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1967; 14(4):287-98. DOI: 10.1007/BF03003698. View

5.
Eastwood G, Reeves J, Cowie B . Nasopharyngeal oxygen in adult intensive care--lower flows and increased comfort. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004; 32(5):670-1. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0403200511. View