» Articles » PMID: 30560031

The Influence of Diagnosis, Age, and Gender on Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity

Overview
Journal Global Spine J
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Dec 19
PMID 30560031
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a multicentric database.

Objectives: To determine the clinical impact of diagnosis, age, and gender on treatment outcomes in surgically treated adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

Methods: A total of 199 surgical patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included and analyzed for baseline characteristics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters by minimum clinically important difference. Statistics were used to analyze the effect of diagnosis, age, and gender on outcome measurements followed by a multivariate binary logistic regression model for these results with statistical significance.

Results: Age was found to affect SF-36 PCS (Short From-36 Physical Component Summary) score significantly, with an odds ratio of 1.017 (unit by unit) of improving SF-36 PCS score on multivariate analysis ( < .05). The breaking point in age for this effect was 37.5 years (AUC = 58.0, = .05). A diagnosis of idiopathic deformity would increase the probability of improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) by a factor of 0.219 and in SF-36 PCS by 0.581 times ( < .05). Gender was found not to have a significant effect on any of the HRQOL scores.

Conclusions: Age, along with a diagnosis of degenerative deformity, may have positive effects on the likelihood of improvement in SF-36 PCS (for age) and ODI (for diagnosis) in surgically treated patients with ASD and the breaking point of this effect may be earlier than generally anticipated. Gender does not seem to affect results. These may be important in patient counseling for the anticipated outcomes of surgery.

Citing Articles

Correlation Between Sagittal Balance and Mechanical Distal Junctional Failure in Degenerative Pathology of the Spine: A Retrospective Analysis.

Montanari S, Griffoni C, Cristofolini L, Girolami M, Gasbarrini A, Barbanti Brodano G Global Spine J. 2023; 15(1):184-195.

PMID: 37562976 PMC: 11696983. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231195954.


Sex and gender determinants following spinal fusion surgery: A systematic review of clinical data.

Salamanna F, Contartese D, Tschon M, Borsari V, Griffoni C, Gasbarrini A Front Surg. 2022; 9:983931.

PMID: 36325040 PMC: 9618873. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.983931.

References
1.
Mannion A, Junge A, Taimela S, Muntener M, Lorenzo K, Dvorak J . Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(8):920-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00015. View

2.
Glassman S, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar J . Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(6):682-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7. View

3.
Aebi M . The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(10):925-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. View

4.
Glassman S, Berven S, Kostuik J, Dimar J, Horton W, Bridwell K . Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(8):941-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209318.32148.8b. View

5.
Glassman S, Schwab F, Bridwell K, Ondra S, Berven S, Lenke L . The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(1):93-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251022.18847.77. View