» Articles » PMID: 30558085

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Dec 19
PMID 30558085
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) for rectal cancer.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2017. Operation related index, postoperative complication, and long-term survival rate and disease-free survival rate were evaluated by meta-analytical techniques.

Result: Nine RCTs enrolling 4126 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared to OS, LS had similar positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and number of lymph nodes extracted (LNE) as well as long term 5 years survival rate and disease-free survival rate, but of which the risk tendency was higher in LS group. The short-term outcomes of major and total postoperative complication were lower in LS group.

Conclusions: LS for rectal cancer was as safe and effective as OS in terms of long-term outcomes, but with lower postoperative complication.

Citing Articles

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.

Peng J, Zhang W, Li W, Ding P, Lu Z, Wu X J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):299.

PMID: 39073652 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02058-7.


Laparoscopic radical surgery for locally advanced T4 transverse colon cancer and prognostic factors analysis: Evidence from multi-center databases.

Xie F, Lu P, Chen Y, Liu X, Zou Z, Gan J Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(48):e36242.

PMID: 38050292 PMC: 10695505. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036242.


Analysis of 10 years of open, laparoscopic, and robotic rectal surgeries in the community setting.

Cooper L, Morant L, Anderson M, Bedra M, Boutros C Surg Open Sci. 2023; 16:165-170.

PMID: 38026827 PMC: 10656262. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.10.011.


Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cirocchi R, Marchetti F, Mari G, Bagolini F, Cavaliere D, Avenia S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):286.

PMID: 37493853 PMC: 10371924. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03022-z.


Fast-track surgery nursing intervention in CRC patients with laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery.

He H, Yang G, Wang S, Han X, Li J Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(37):e30603.

PMID: 36123937 PMC: 9478316. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030603.


References
1.
Huang M, Liang J, Wang H, Kang L, Deng Y, Wang J . Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010; 26(4):415-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1091-6. View

2.
Ng S, Leung K, Lee J, Yiu R, Li J, Teoh A . Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15(9):2418-25. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. View

3.
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Desiderio J, Vettoretto N, Parisi A . High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol. 2012; 21(3):e111-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.004. View

4.
Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M . Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(5):1485-502. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x. View

5.
Ivanov P, Vasilev K, Kotashev G, Grigorov G, Kiossev V, Hristova V . Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal carcinoma--a prospective analysis. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013; (1):23-9. View