Variation of Degree of Stenosis Quantification Using Different Energy Level with Dual Energy CT Scanner

Overview

Journal Neuroradiology

Specialties Neurology
Radiology

Date 2018 Dec 17

PMID 30554271

Citations 4

Authors

Luca Saba

Giovanni Maria Argioas

Pierleone Lucatelli

Francesco Lavra

Jasjit S Suri

Max Wintermark

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the variation in the quantification of the carotid degree of stenosis (DoS) with a dual energy computed tomography (CT), using different energy levels during the image reconstruction.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 53 subjects (37 males; mean age 67 ± 11 years; age range 47-83 years) studied with a multi-energy CT scanner were included. Datasets were reconstructed on a dedicated workstation and from the CT raw data multiple datasets were generated at the following monochromatic energy levels: 66, 70, 77, and 86 kilo-electronvolt (keV). Two radiologists independently performed all measurements for quantification of the degree of stenosis. Wilcoxon test was used to test the differences between the Hounsifield unit (HU) values in the plaques at different keV.

Results: The Wilcoxon analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in the DoS assessment among the different keVs selected. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the DoS difference had a linear relation with the keV difference (the bigger is the difference in keV, the bigger is the variation in DoS) and that for different keVs, the difference in DoS is reduced with its increase.

Conclusion: A standardization in the use of the energy level during the image reconstruction should be considered.

Citing Articles

Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application.

Saba L, Sanagala S, Gupta S, Koppula V, Johri A, Khanna N Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(14):1206.

PMID: 34430647 PMC: 8350643. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7676.

A Novel Block Imaging Technique Using Nine Artificial Intelligence Models for COVID-19 Disease Classification, Characterization and Severity Measurement in Lung Computed Tomography Scans on an Italian Cohort.

Agarwal M, Saba L, Gupta S, Carriero A, Falaschi Z, Pasche A J Med Syst. 2021; 45(3):28.

PMID: 33496876 PMC: 7835451. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01707-w.

Plaque imaging volume analysis: technique and application.

Murgia A, Balestrieri A, Francone M, Lucatelli P, Scapin E, Buckler A Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020; 10(4):1032-1047.

PMID: 32968659 PMC: 7487381. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.03.01.

Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications.

Almqvist H, Almqvist N, Holmin S, Mazya M Front Neurol. 2020; 11:357.

PMID: 32508735 PMC: 7249255. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00357.

References

Saba L, Mallarini G . MDCTA of carotid plaque degree of stenosis: evaluation of interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 190(1):W41-6. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2604. View

Saba L, Mallarin G . Window settings for the study of calcified carotid plaques with multidetector CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(7):1445-50. PMC: 7051539. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1509. View

Saba L, Mallarini G . A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 76(1):42-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.064. View

Kau T, Eicher W, Reiterer C, Niedermayer M, Rabitsch E, Senft B . Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(8):1677-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2099-1. View

Tawfik A, Kerl J, Razek A, Bauer R, Nour-Eldin N, Vogl T . Image quality and radiation dose of dual-energy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120-kVp acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(11):1994-9. PMC: 7964383. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2654. View

Mannelli L, Mitsumori L, Ferguson M, Xu D, Chu B, Branch K . Changes in measured size of atherosclerotic plaque calcifications in dual-energy CT of ex vivo carotid endarterectomy specimens: effect of monochromatic keV image reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(2):367-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2623-y. View

Saba L, Argiolas G, Siotto P, Piga M . Carotid artery plaque characterization using CT multienergy imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 34(4):855-9. PMC: 7964496. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3285. View

Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B, Danz S, Thomas C, Ketelsen D . High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of supra-aortic arteries: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Neuroradiology. 2012; 55(4):423-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1120-y. View

Marin D, Boll D, Mileto A, Nelson R . State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Radiology. 2014; 271(2):327-42. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131480. View

10.

Mannelli L, MacDonald L, Mancini M, Ferguson M, Shuman W, Ragucci M . Dual energy computed tomography quantification of carotid plaques calcification: comparison between monochromatic and polychromatic energies with pathology correlation. Eur Radiol. 2014; 25(5):1238-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3523-0. View

11.

Shinohara Y, Sakamoto M, Kuya K, Kishimoto J, Iwata N, Ohta Y . Assessment of carotid plaque composition using fast-kV switching dual-energy CT with gemstone detector: comparison with extracorporeal and virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound. Neuroradiology. 2015; 57(9):889-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-015-1541-5. View

12.

Stehli J, Clerc O, Fuchs T, Possner M, Grani C, Benz D . Impact of monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from single-source dual-energy CT on coronary stenosis quantification. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10(2):135-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.12.008. View

13.

Riffel P, Haubenreisser H, Meyer M, Sudarski S, Morelli J, Schmidt B . Carotid dual-energy CT angiography: Evaluation of low keV calculated monoenergetic datasets by means of a frequency-split approach for noise reduction at low keV levels. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(4):720-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.015. View

14.

Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E . Dual-Energy Spectral CT: Various Clinical Vascular Applications. Radiographics. 2016; 36(4):1215-32. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150185. View

15.

Neuhaus V, Grosse Hokamp N, Abdullayev N, Maus V, Kabbasch C, Mpotsaris A . Comparison of virtual monoenergetic and polyenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer detector CT angiography of the head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2017; 28(3):1102-1110. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5081-8. View

16.

Saba L, Yuan C, Hatsukami T, Balu N, Qiao Y, DeMarco J . Carotid Artery Wall Imaging: Perspective and Guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(2):E9-E31. PMC: 7410574. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5488. View

17.

Leithner D, Mahmoudi S, Wichmann J, Martin S, Lenga L, Albrecht M . Evaluation of virtual monoenergetic imaging algorithms for dual-energy carotid and intracerebral CT angiography: Effects on image quality, artefacts and diagnostic performance for the detection of stenosis. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 99:111-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.024. View

18.

Agostini A, Mahmood U, Erdi Y, Borgheresi A, Ragucci M, Sawan P . Quantification of Iodine Concentration Using Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in a Calf Liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018; 42(2):222-229. PMC: 5847415. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000685. View

19.

Leithner D, Wichmann J, Mahmoudi S, Martin S, Albrecht M, Vogl T . Diagnostic yield of 90-kVp low-tube-voltage carotid and intracerebral CT-angiography: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance for the detection of carotid stenosis. Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1086):20170927. PMC: 6223293. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170927. View

20.

Zopfs D, Lennartz S, Laukamp K, Grosse Hokamp N, Mpotsaris A, Maintz D . Improved depiction of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis in virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of venous phase dual-layer computed tomography in comparison to polyenergetic reconstructions. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 100:36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.008. View