» Articles » PMID: 30552642

Pupil Size and Search Performance in Low and High Perceptual Load

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Dec 16
PMID 30552642
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to focus on a task while disregarding irrelevant information is an example of selective attention. The perceptual-load hypothesis argues that the occurrence of early or late selection mechanisms is determined by task-relevant perceptual load. Additionally, evidence shows that pupil size serves as proxy of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) activity, a system associated with cognitive and attentional mediation. Here, we assessed pupil baseline (and pupil dilation) as predictors of load-related early and late selection performance. Participants were asked to search for a target in conditions of high and low perceptual load, while ignoring irrelevant stimuli. The results showed that pupil baseline size, measured prior trial onset, significantly predicted the upcoming search efficiency only in low perceptual load, when-according to the perceptual-load hypothesis-all perceptual information receives attentional resources. In addition, pupil dilation was linked to the time course of perceptual processing and predicted response times in both perceptual load conditions, an association that was enhanced in high load. Thus, this study relates attentional selection mechanisms, as defined by the perceptual-load theory, with pupil-related LC-NE activity. Because pupil baseline predicted attentional performance in low load but not in high load, this suggests that different attentional mechanisms are involved, one in which the LC-NE system plays a key role (low load) and one in which it is less relevant (high load). This suggests that the degree with which LC-NE influences behavioral performance is related to the perceptual load of the task at hand.

Citing Articles

Evoked and entrained pupillary activity while moving to preferred tempo and beyond.

Spiech C, Hope M, Begel V iScience. 2025; 28(1):111530.

PMID: 39758823 PMC: 11699394. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111530.


Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words.

Patrick S, Rapport L, Hanks R, Kanser R J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024; 46(1):36-45.

PMID: 38402625 PMC: 11087194. DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2312624.


Elevated and accelerated: Locus coeruleus activity and visual search abilities in autistic children.

Keehn B, Kadlaskar G, McNally Keehn R Cortex. 2023; 169:118-129.

PMID: 37866060 PMC: 10842606. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.016.


Establishing gaze markers of perceptual load during multi-target visual search.

Harris A, Eayrs J, Lavie N Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):56.

PMID: 37648839 PMC: 10468466. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00498-7.


Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings.

Spiech C, Sioros G, Endestad T, Danielsen A, Laeng B Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11620.

PMID: 35804069 PMC: 9270355. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15763-w.


References
1.
Lisi M, Bonato M, Zorzi M . Pupil dilation reveals top-down attentional load during spatial monitoring. Biol Psychol. 2015; 112:39-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.002. View

2.
Lavie N . Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(3):451-68. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451. View

3.
Cave K, Chen Z . Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016; 78(7):1822-38. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1149-9. View

4.
TREISMAN A . Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol Rev. 1969; 76(3):282-99. DOI: 10.1037/h0027242. View

5.
Arnsten A, Rubia K . Neurobiological circuits regulating attention, cognitive control, motivation, and emotion: disruptions in neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012; 51(4):356-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.008. View