» Articles » PMID: 30552157

Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequential or Concurrent FOLFOXIRI-Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (STEAM)

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Dec 16
PMID 30552157
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: First-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically entails a biologic such as bevacizumab (BEV) with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI). STEAM (NCT01765582) assessed the efficacy of BEV plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (FOLFOXIRI), administered concurrently (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV) or sequentially (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, FOLFOX-BEV alternating with FOLFIRI-BEV), versus FOLFOX-BEV for mCRC.

Patients And Methods: Patients with previously untreated mCRC ( = 280) were randomized 1:1:1 to cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, or FOLFOX-BEV and treated with 4-6-month induction followed by maintenance. Coprimary objectives were overall response rate (ORR; first-line cFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs. FOLFOX-BEV) and progression-free survival (PFS; pooled first-line cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs. FOLFOX-BEV). Secondary/exploratory objectives included overall survival (OS), liver resection rates, biomarker analyses, and safety.

Results: ORR was 72.0%, 72.8%, and 62.1% and median PFS was 11.9, 11.4, and 9.5 months with cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, and FOLFOX-BEV, respectively. OS was similar between arms. ORR between cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and FOLFOX-BEV did not significantly differ ( = .132); thus, the primary ORR endpoint was not met. cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV numerically improved ORR and PFS, regardless of status. Median PFS was higher with pooled concurrent and sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV versus FOLFOX-BEV (11.7 vs. 9.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.7; 90% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9; < .01). Liver resection rates were 17.2% (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV), 9.8% (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV), and 8.4% (FOLFOX-BEV). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 91.2% (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV), 86.7% (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV), and 85.6% (FOLFOX-BEV) of patients, with no increase in serious chemotherapy-associated TEAEs.

Conclusion: cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV were well tolerated with numerically improved ORR, PFS, and liver resection rates versus FOLFOX-BEV, supporting triplet chemotherapy plus BEV as a first-line treatment option for mCRC IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of first-line FOLFIRI with FOLFOX and bevacizumab (concurrent FOLFOXIRI-BEV) improves clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) relative to FOLFIRI-BEV or FOLFOX-BEV, but it is thought to be associated with increased toxicity. Alternating treatment of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI (sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV) could improve tolerability. In the phase II STEAM trial, which is the largest study of FOLFOXIRI-BEV in patients in the U.S., it was found that both concurrent and sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV are active and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated mCRC, supporting the use of these regimens as potential first-line treatment options for this population.

Citing Articles

Alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab in untreated unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial.

Li S, Li X, Xu H, Huang J, Zhu J, Peng Y Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):346.

PMID: 39658608 PMC: 11631963. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02048-z.


Bevacizumab versus aflibercept with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX and bevacizumab in RAS mutant metastatic colon cancer a Turkish oncology group study.

Sekmek S, Ozsan Celebi S, Bayram D, Erol C, Kos F, Sendur M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29785.

PMID: 39616250 PMC: 11608356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81371-5.


FOLFOXIRI for First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Hao V, Tri P, My D, Anh L, Viet Trung L, Bac N J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024; 56(1):12.

PMID: 39480530 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01133-4.


Overall survival with non-proportional hazards in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Keshavarzi F, Salari N, Jambarsang S, Tabatabaei S, Shahsavari S, Fournier A Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36464.

PMID: 39253267 PMC: 11381762. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36464.


Alliance A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced....

Alvarez J, Shi Q, Dasari A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanoff H, George T BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):901.

PMID: 39060961 PMC: 11282593. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12529-7.


References
1.
Douillard J, Cunningham D, Roth A, Navarro M, James R, Karasek P . Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000; 355(9209):1041-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02034-1. View

2.
de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J . Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(16):2938-47. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.2938. View

3.
Saltz L, Cox J, Blanke C, Rosen L, Fehrenbacher L, Moore M . Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(13):905-14. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302. View

4.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W . Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(23):2335-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032691. View

5.
Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, Pfanner E, Allegrini G, Barbara C . Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo.... J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(13):1670-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0928. View