Influence of PH on Isometric Force Development and Relaxation in Skinned Vascular Smooth Muscle
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The effects of pH (from pH values 6.50-7.10) on isometric tension development and relaxation were investigated in Triton X-100 "skinned" rat caudal artery. Helically cut skinned strips contracted in 21 microM Ca2+ were studied with respect to maximal isometric tension (Po) and rate of contraction (T0.5 C), and following relaxation in 18 nm Ca2+, the rate of relaxation (T0.5 R). Acidic pH (pH 6.50) decreased Po to 87% of isometric force obtained at pH 6.90, and increased the rate of contraction as shown by a decrease of T0.5 C to 80%. In contrast, T0.5 R increased 4.5-fold, indicating that with a change of only 0.40 pH units, relaxation rates were dramatically decreased. pCa-tension curves at pH values 6.50, 6.70, 6.90 and 7.10 indicated no significant shift in half maximal activation (pCa50) between pH 6.50 and 6.70, but a significant (P less than 0.01) shift in pCa50 between pH 6.70 [( Ca2+] = 0.46 microM) and pH 7.10 [( Ca2+] = 0.87 microM). Compared to contractions at pH 6.90, myosin light chain (LC20) phosphorylation at pH 6.50 was significantly greater at 30 and 60 s into contraction but not significantly different at 3-10 min. At both pH 6.50 and 6.90, dephosphorylation was rapid and substantially preceded relaxation; LC20 dephosphorylation and relaxation occurred more rapidly at pH 6.90 than at 6.50. At pH 6.50 and 6.90, relax solutions made with increased Ca2+ buffering capacity showed no effect in enhancing T0.5 R, suggesting the difference between relaxation rates was not due to Ca2+ diffusion limitations from the skinned strip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Mechanisms of action of pH-induced effects on vascular smooth muscle.
Wray S, Smith R Mol Cell Biochem. 2016; 263(1):163-72.
PMID: 27520675 DOI: 10.1023/B:MCBI.0000041858.78005.d2.
Hemodynamic consequences of severe lactic acidosis in shock states: from bench to bedside.
Kimmoun A, Novy E, Auchet T, Ducrocq N, Levy B Crit Care. 2015; 19:175.
PMID: 25887061 PMC: 4391479. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0896-7.
Boedtkjer E, Damkier H, Aalkjaer C J Physiol. 2012; 590(8):1895-906.
PMID: 22351634 PMC: 3573311. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.227132.
Furukawa K, Komaba J, Sakai H, Ohizumi Y Br J Pharmacol. 1996; 118(3):485-92.
PMID: 8762069 PMC: 1909719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15429.x.
Austin C, Wray S J Physiol. 1995; 488 ( Pt 2):281-91.
PMID: 8568670 PMC: 1156670. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020966.