Gatekeeper Improves Voluntary Contractility in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Gatekeeper (GK) has shown to be safe and effective in patients with fecal incontinence (FI). We aimed to understand its mechanism of action by comparing pre- and post-implant change in the external anal sphincter (EAS) contractility.
Methods: Study of EAS contractility was conducted in 16 FI females (median age = 69 years) before and after implant of 6 GK prostheses. Muscle tension ( Tm), expressed in millinewtons per centimeter squared, mN(cm), was calculated using the equation Tm = P(r)(tm), where P is the average maximum squeeze pressure and r and tm the inner radius and thickness of the EAS, respectively. The effect of a predefined set of covariates on Tm was tested by restricted maximum likelihood models.
Results: Compared with baseline, despite unchanged tm (2.7 [2.5-2.8] vs 2.5 [2.2-2.8] mm; P = .31 mm), a significant increase in P (median = 45.8 [26.5-75.8] vs 60.4 [43.1-88.1] mm Hg; P = .017), and r (12.4 [11.5-13.4] vs 18.7 [17.3-19.6] mm; P < .001) resulted in an increase in Tm (233.2 [123.8-303.2] vs 490.8 [286.9-562.4] mN(cm); P < .001) at 12 months after GK implant. Twelve-month follow-up improvements were also observed on Cleveland Clinic FI score (8-point median decrease; P = .0001), St Marks FI score (10-point median decrease; P < .0001), and American Medical Systems score (39-point median decrease; P < .0001). Restricted maximum likelihood models showed that years of onset of FI was negatively associated with change in Tm ( P = .048).
Conclusions: GK-related EAS compression positively influences muscle contractility by increasing r, with consequent increase in Tm (length-tension relationship). Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness of GK.
Systematic Localisation Based on History and Clinical Examination.
Samsudin M, Manokaran T, Ali M, Jamaluddin A, Sashideran D, Ting H Malays J Med Sci. 2025; 31(6):217-256.
PMID: 39830106 PMC: 11740810. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.6.17.
Tur-Martinez J, Lagares-Tena L, Hinojosa-Fano J, Arroyo A, Navarro-Luna A, Munoz-Duyos A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).
PMID: 39458106 PMC: 11508701. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206156.
Gassner L, Wild C, Walter M BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22(1):389.
PMID: 35978293 PMC: 9386976. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02441-4.
Jabbar S, Camilleri-Brennan J Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26(7):537-543.
PMID: 35593969 PMC: 9213285. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02630-z.
Munoz-Duyos A, Lagares-Tena L, Ribas Y, Baanante J, Navarro-Luna A Tech Coloproctol. 2021; 26(1):1-17.
PMID: 34767095 PMC: 8587500. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02544-2.