» Articles » PMID: 30547683

Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2018 Dec 15
PMID 30547683
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Analytical quality of blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS) is an important aspect for many diabetes patients. Sufficiently high analytical quality is required for adequate diabetes therapy.

Methods: In this study, system accuracy and measurement precision of a BGMS were assessed based on ISO 15197:2013. For system accuracy, this standard requires a specific glucose distribution and at least 95% of results obtained with the BGMS in capillary blood to fall within ±15 mg/dl or ±15% (at glucose concentrations <100 mg/dl or ≥100 mg/dl, respectively) of corresponding comparison method results, and at least 99% of results to be found within clinically acceptable consensus error grid (CEG) zones A and B. Based on ISO 15197:2013, intermediate measurement precision, using control solution, and measurement repeatability, using venous blood samples, were analyzed by calculation of standard deviations (SDs) and coefficients of variation (CV) at glucose concentrations <100 mg/dl or ≥100 mg/dl, respectively, although ISO 15197:2013 does not specify acceptance criteria.

Results: The BGMS fulfilled system accuracy requirements with ≥99% of results within ±15 mg/dl or ±15% of the comparison method results, and 100% of results in CEG zones A and B. Intermediate measurement precision analysis showed SD ≤2.2 mg/dl and CV ≤2.3%. Analysis of measurement repeatability showed SD ≤2.1 mg/dl and CV ≤2.4%.

Conclusion: System accuracy requirements of ISO 15197:2013 were fulfilled by the BGMS. As ISO 15197:2013 does not specify precision requirements, precision analysis results were compared with those reported for other BGMS in the literature and found to be similar.

Citing Articles

Quality assessment of glucose measurement with regard to epidemiology and clinical management of diabetes mellitus in Germany.

Luppa P, Zeller M, Pieper M, Kaiser P, Weiss N, Vierbaum L Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1371426.

PMID: 38572446 PMC: 10987728. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1371426.


Getting More Information From Glucose Meter Evaluations.

Krouwer J, Garrett P J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 13(6):1175-1177.

PMID: 31064212 PMC: 6835175. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819842186.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Caswell M, Frank J, Viggiani M, Pardo S, Dunne N, Warchal-Windham M . Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 17(3):152-8. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0129. View

3.
Kovatchev B, Wakeman C, Breton M, Kost G, Louie R, Tran N . Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 8(4):673-84. PMC: 4764239. DOI: 10.1177/1932296814539590. View

4.
Ji L, Guo L, Liu L . Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 54(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0130. View

5.
Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Liebing C, Beer A, Flacke F . Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 20(4):303-313. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0391. View